Literature DB >> 19047107

Prognostic factors and survival in 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor treated at a single institution.

Sara Ekeblad1, Britt Skogseid, Kristina Dunder, Kjell Oberg, Barbro Eriksson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unequivocal pathologic markers for the prognosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors are often lacking. Suggestions for prognostic guidance include the WHO classification. Recently, a tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system was proposed. We evaluate this system, as well as assess other potential prognostic factors such as tumor Ki67, size, endocrine syndrome, heredity, body mass index (BMI), and plasma chromogranin A, in a large patient material treated at a single institution. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A total of 324 patients with pancreatic endocrine tumor, consecutively diagnosed and treated at a tertiary referral center, were retrospectively evaluated. Median follow-up was 54 months (range, 1-423 months). Patient and tumor data were extracted from medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to recognize factors of prognostic value.
RESULTS: The median overall survival was 99 months (95% confidence interval, 81-117). Five- and 10-year survival rates were 64% and 44%, respectively. In univariate analysis, TNM stage, radical surgery, WHO classification, nonfunctioning tumor, Ki67 > or = 2%, chromogranin A > or = 3 times the upper normal limit, BMI < 20 kg/m2, sporadic tumor, tumor size, and referral from our primary uptake area had a significant prognostic effect. In multivariate analysis, TNM stage, WHO classification, radical surgery, and Ki67 > or = 2% retained their significance. Having a nonfunctioning tumor was not an independent marker of poor prognosis and neither was heredity.
CONCLUSIONS: The recently suggested TNM staging system emerged as a useful clinical tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19047107     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  110 in total

1.  Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Shinichi Yachida; Efsevia Vakiani; Catherine M White; Yi Zhong; Tyler Saunders; Richard Morgan; Roeland F de Wilde; Anirban Maitra; Jessica Hicks; Angelo M Demarzo; Chanjuan Shi; Rajni Sharma; Daniel Laheru; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard D Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Laura H Tang; David S Klimstra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Contemporary management of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Rebecca M Minter; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  [The ENETS and UICC TNM classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: comment].

Authors:  G Klöppel; G Rindi; A Perren; P Komminoth; D S Klimstra
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  The ENETS and AJCC/UICC TNM classifications of the neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: a statement.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel; Guido Rindi; Aurel Perren; Paul Komminoth; David S Klimstra
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors in 78 Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingaku Lee; Hisato Igarashi; Nao Fujimori; Masayuki Hijioka; Ken Kawabe; Yoshinao Oda; Robert T Jensen; Tetsuhide Ito
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: hypoenhancement on arterial phase computed tomography predicts biological aggressiveness.

Authors:  David J Worhunsky; Geoffrey W Krampitz; Peter D Poullos; Brendan C Visser; Pamela L Kunz; George A Fisher; Jeffrey A Norton; George A Poultsides
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Grading of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is improved by the inclusion of both Ki67 proliferative index and mitotic rate.

Authors:  Chad M McCall; Chanjuan Shi; Toby C Cornish; David S Klimstra; Laura H Tang; Olca Basturk; Liew Jun Mun; Trevor A Ellison; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Interlaboratory variability of MIB1 staining in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Annika Blank; Laura Wehweck; Ilaria Marinoni; Laura Amanda Boos; Frank Bergmann; Anja Maria Schmitt; Aurel Perren
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres in Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Is Associated with Aggressive Clinical Behavior and Poor Survival.

Authors:  Joo Young Kim; Jacqueline A Brosnan-Cashman; Soyeon An; Sung Joo Kim; Ki-Byung Song; Min-Sun Kim; Mi-Ju Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Alan K Meeker; Eunsil Yu; Song Cheol Kim; Ralph H Hruban; Christopher M Heaphy; Seung-Mo Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Revised staging classification improves outcome prediction for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Michelle Kang Kim; Richard R P Warner; Sasan Roayaie; Noam Harpaz; Stephen C Ward; Steven Itzkowitz; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.