PURPOSE: Stratifying patients who have a high risk of prostate cancer recurrence following prostatectomy can potentiate the use of adjuvant therapy at an early stage. Inflammation has emerged as a mediator of prostate cancer metastatic progression. We hypothesized that chemokines can be biomarkers for distinguishing patients with high risk for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a nested case-control study, 82 subjects developed biochemical recurrence within 5 years of prostatectomy. Prostate tissues from 98 age-matched subjects who were recurrence-free following prostatectomy in the same period were the controls. A high-throughput lectin-based enrichment of prostate tissue enabled multiplex ELISA to identify the expression of three chemokines to discriminate the two patient populations. RESULTS: The expression of CX3CL1 and IL-15 in prostate tissue was associated with 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival following prostatectomy. However, the expression of chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) was associated with biochemical recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression model combining preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, surgical margin, and seminal vesicle status with the three chemokines doubled the specificity of prediction at 90% sensitivity compared with use of the clinicopathologic variables alone (P < 0.0001). Survival analysis yielded a nomogram that supported the use of CX3CL1, IL-15, and CCL4 in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival after prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Each of the three chemokines can serve as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. However, the combination of chemokine biomarkers plus clinicopathologic variables discriminated prostatectomy subjects for the probability of biochemical recurrence significantly better than clinicopathologic variables alone.
PURPOSE: Stratifying patients who have a high risk of prostate cancer recurrence following prostatectomy can potentiate the use of adjuvant therapy at an early stage. Inflammation has emerged as a mediator of prostate cancer metastatic progression. We hypothesized that chemokines can be biomarkers for distinguishing patients with high risk for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a nested case-control study, 82 subjects developed biochemical recurrence within 5 years of prostatectomy. Prostate tissues from 98 age-matched subjects who were recurrence-free following prostatectomy in the same period were the controls. A high-throughput lectin-based enrichment of prostate tissue enabled multiplex ELISA to identify the expression of three chemokines to discriminate the two patient populations. RESULTS: The expression of CX3CL1 and IL-15 in prostate tissue was associated with 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival following prostatectomy. However, the expression of chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4) was associated with biochemical recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression model combining preoperative prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, surgical margin, and seminal vesicle status with the three chemokines doubled the specificity of prediction at 90% sensitivity compared with use of the clinicopathologic variables alone (P < 0.0001). Survival analysis yielded a nomogram that supported the use of CX3CL1, IL-15, and CCL4 in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival after prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Each of the three chemokines can serve as independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. However, the combination of chemokine biomarkers plus clinicopathologic variables discriminated prostatectomy subjects for the probability of biochemical recurrence significantly better than clinicopathologic variables alone.
Authors: Shannon A Shulby; Nathan G Dolloff; Mark E Stearns; Olimpia Meucci; Alessandro Fatatis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Scott C Morgan; Tricia S Waldron; Libni Eapen; Linda A Mayhew; Eric Winquist; Himu Lukka Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; Lionel L Bañez; Donna E Levy; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Whitney L Jamieson; Saori Shimizu; Julia A D'Ambrosio; Olimpia Meucci; Alessandro Fatatis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Haibin Lu; Baolei Wu; Ge Ma; Deyu Zheng; Ruijuan Song; Erjiang Huang; Ming Mao; Bin Lu Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Laura E Pascal; Young Ah Goo; Ricardo Zn Vêncio; Laura S Page; Amber A Chambers; Emily S Liebeskind; Thomas K Takayama; Lawrence D True; Alvin Y Liu Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Laura E Pascal; Ricardo Z N Vêncio; Laura S Page; Emily S Liebeskind; Christina P Shadle; Pamela Troisch; Bruz Marzolf; Lawrence D True; Leroy E Hood; Alvin Y Liu Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Naomi Morka; Benjamin S Simpson; Rhys Ball; Alex Freeman; Alex Kirkham; Daniel Kelly; Hayley C Whitaker; Mark Emberton; Joseph M Norris Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sally Stabler; Tatsuki Koyama; Zhiguo Zhao; Magaly Martinez-Ferrer; Robert H Allen; Zigmund Luka; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Peter E Clark; Conrad Wagner; Neil A Bhowmick Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 3.240