Literature DB >> 10736506

Combination of the preoperative PSA level, biopsy gleason score, percentage of positive biopsies, and MRI T-stage to predict early PSA failure in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

A V D'Amico1, R Whittington, S B Malkowicz, Y H Wu, M Chen, M Art, J E Tomaszewski, A Wein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Early (2 years or less) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure has been shown to predict for distant failure. The independent clinical predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure were used to identify prostate cancer patients at high risk for early PSA failure.
METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine whether additional predictive information was provided by the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) T-stage when controlling for the established prognostic factors in predicting the time to postoperative PSA failure in 977 men with palpable (T2) or PSA-detected (T1c) prostate cancer.
RESULTS: Preoperative PSA (P = 0.0001), percentage of positive prostate biopsies (P= 0.0001), erMRI T-stage (P = 0.0001), biopsy Gleason score (P = 0.0015), and clinical stage T2c disease (P = 0.004) were independent predictors of time to postoperative PSA failure. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in nomogram format stratified by the preoperative PSA, percentage of positive prostate biopsies, erMRI T-stage, and the biopsy Gleason score.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high risk for early PSA failure and subsequent distant progression include men with erMRI T3 disease and 3 or more of 6 cores positive for a Gleason score 6 or higher disease when the PSA is more than 10 but not more than 20 ng/mL and any Gleason score when the PSA is more than 20 ng/mL. Men with erMRI T2 disease and 3 or more of 6 cores positive for a Gleason score 8 or higher disease and who have a PSA more than 20 ng/mL are also at high risk. Neoadjuvant therapy trials in these select patients may be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10736506     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00479-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

1.  Risk assessment for biochemical recurrence prior to radical prostatectomy: significant enhancement contributed by human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with moderate PSA-elevation in serum.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Clinical utility of endorectal MRI-guided prostate biopsy: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Adam J Jung; Antonio C Westphalen; John Kurhanewicz; Zhen J Wang; Peter R Carroll; Jeffry P Simko; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  HAROW: the first comprehensive prospective observational study comparing treatment options in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lothar Weissbach; Steffen Stuerzebecher; Eberhard Mumperow; Theodor Klotz; Dietrich Schnell
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Molecular staging by RT-pCR analysis for PSA and PSMA in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples is an independent predictor of time to biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Constantine S Mitsiades; Peter Lembessis; Antigone Sourla; Constantine Milathianakis; Athanassios Tsintavis; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  Use of nomograms as predictive tools in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Shabsigh; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  Chemokine markers predict biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer following prostatectomy.

Authors:  David L Blum; Tatsuki Koyama; Amosy E M'Koma; Juan M Iturregui; Magaly Martinez-Ferrer; Consolate Uwamariya; Joseph A Smith; Peter E Clark; Neil A Bhowmick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: multicenter experience in Turkey including 1,499 patients.

Authors:  A I Tasci; I Tufek; E Gumus; A E Canda; V Tugcu; F Atug; U Boylu; Z Akbulut; S Sahin; A Simsek; A R Kural
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Mark G Swanson; Sarah J Nelson; Daniel B Vigneron
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.