| Literature DB >> 19046420 |
Elena Pestsova1, Juliane Meinhard, Andreas Menze, Uwe Fischer, Andrea Windhövel, Peter Westhoff.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With a cultivation area of 1.75 Mio ha and sugar yield of 16.7 Mio tons in 2006, sugar beet is a crop of great economic importance in Europe. The productivity of sugar beet is determined significantly by seed vigour and field emergence potential; however, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying these traits. Both traits exhibit large variations within sugar beet germplasm that have been difficult to ascribe to either environmental or genetic causes. Among potential targets for trait improvement, an enhancement of stress tolerance is considered because of the high negative influence of environmental stresses on trait parameters. Extending our knowledge of genetic and molecular determinants of sugar beet germination, stress response and adaptation mechanisms would facilitate the detection of new targets for breeding crop with an enhanced field emergence potential.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19046420 PMCID: PMC2632670 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Time-course of germination under standard and multistress conditions. (●) – standard conditions: 30 ml of H2O, 15°C; (▲) – multistress conditions: 60 ml of 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM mannitol, 10°C. Data for each time point are averaged of three independent germination experiments. Germination parameters are evaluated by SeedCalculator 3.0 (Plant Research International, Wageningen).
Figure 2K-mean clustering of 674 genes expressed differentially during germination under standard conditions. Gene expression was monitored in dry (T0) and germinating (T1, T50, Tmax) seeds. Transcript abundance is shown as Log2-transform and gene-centered signal intensities. (A) Every horizontal row represents an individual gene. Red indicates transcript abundance above the mean and blue indicates transcript abundance below the mean (see also colour scale at bottom). (B) Temporal alterations of transcript abundance are shown. Transcript profile of each gene is shown as a grey line, magenta lines indicate the averaged expression values for each cluster.
Figure 3Comparison of results obtained by macroarray and RNA dot-blot analysis. (A) Gel-electrophoresis of RNA samples used for experiments, 1 μg of total RNA is loaded. (B) Control RNA dot-blot: 18S rRNA. (C) Graphical representations of gene expression data obtained by macroarray technique are shown adjacent to the corresponding RNA dot-blots. For (B) and (C): 5 μg of total RNA is loaded on a membrane and hybridized with a 32P-labelled probe.
Functional classification of genes expressed differentially during germination under standard conditions.
| k1.1 | k1.2 | k2.1 | k2.2 | |||
| 11 | 5 | - | - | |||
| Storage proteins | 6 | 6 | - | 2 | ||
| Maturation proteins | 10 | 10 | - | - | ||
| 8 | 4 | 2 | - | |||
| Protein biosynthesis | 13 | 16 | 17 | 9 | ||
| Post-translation modification and folding | 17 | 1 | 17 | 13 | ||
| Protein catabolism | 12 | 4 | 8 | 4 | ||
| Methionine cycle | - | - | 3 | 1 | ||
| Other amino acid metabolism | 2 | - | 2 | - | ||
| Lipid biosynthesis | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||
| Lipid degradation | 1 | - | 4 | - | ||
| Starch, sucrose biosynthesis | - | - | - | 2 | ||
| Starch degradation | - | - | 1 | 1 | ||
| Other | - | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Cell wall biosynthesis | - | - | 3 | 3 | ||
| Cell wall loosening | - | - | 2 | 4 | ||
| 7 | 2 | 16 | 8 | |||
| Glycolysis | 1 | - | 3 | 7 | ||
| Gluconeogenesis | - | - | - | 1 | ||
| Glyoxylate cycle | - | - | 1 | - | ||
| Pentose phosphate pathway | - | - | 2 | 5 | ||
| Tricarboxylic acid cycle | - | - | 4 | 1 | ||
| Photorespiration | - | - | 4 | 2 | ||
| Photosynthesis | 1 | - | 1 | 6 | ||
| Mitochondrial energy conversion | - | - | 8 | 2 | ||
| 1 | - | 1 | 3 | |||
| 16 | 5 | 15 | 13 | |||
| 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||
| 9 | 1 | 8 | 11 | |||
| 2 | - | 15 | 3 | |||
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| 44 | 24 | 18 | 28 | |||
| 44 | 20 | 24 | 19 | |||
| 225 | 105 | 187 | 157 | |||
Figure 4Functional classification of abundant mRNA species. Highly abundant transcripts are divided in three groups: preferentially expressed in dry seeds (28 genes), highly expressed both in dry and germinating seeds (41 genes) and preferentially expressed in germinating seeds (33 genes).
Specification of transcripts showing similarity to enzymes involved in starch and lipid reserve mobilization.a
| Alpha-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) | k2.2 | 4240 | 148.2 | ||
| Alpha-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) | k2.1 | 1820 | 43.1 | ||
| Beta-amylase (EC 3.2.1.2) | - | 490 | 5.1 | ||
| Beta-amylase (EC 3.2.1.2) | - | 205 | 0.3 | ||
| Alpha-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.20) | - | 5 | 1.0 | ||
| Phosphoglucomutase (EC 5.4.2.2), cytosolic | - | 70 | 1.0 | ||
| UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (EC 2.7.7.9) | - | 110 | 3.2 | ||
| Phosphofructokinase (PFK) (EC 2.7.1.11) | k1.1 | 40 | 0.1 | ||
| Pyrophosphate-fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP) (EC 2.7.1.90) | k2.2 | 180 | 2.7 | ||
| Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.1), cytosolic | - | 510 | 2.7 | ||
| Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.1), plastidic | k2.2 | 180 | 10.4 | ||
| Triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) (EC 5.3.1.1), cytosolic | k2.2 | 400 | 7.9 | ||
| Glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (EC 1.2.1.12), cytosolic | k2.2 | 1980 | 2.3 | ||
| Phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) (EC2.7.2.3), cytosolic | k2.2 | 575 | 3.8 | ||
| Phosphoglycerate mutase (PGAM) (EC 5.4.2.1), cytosolic | - | 35 | 2.4 | ||
| Enolase (ENO) (EC 4.2.1.11), cytosolic | k2.1 | 440 | 4.1 | ||
| Pyruvate kinase (PK) (EC 2.7.1.40), cytosolic | k2.1 | 210 | 2.1 | ||
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha subunit (EC 1.2.4.1) | k2.1 | 80 | 4.9 | ||
| Alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) | k2.2 | 30 | 3.0 | ||
| Alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) | - | 460 | 0.5 | ||
| Acyl-CoA synthetase (EC 6.2.1.3) | - | 165 | 3.5 | ||
| Acyl-CoA oxidase ACX3 (EC 1.3.3.6) | - | 120 | 1.5 | ||
| Enoyl-CoA hydratase (EC 4.2.1.17) | k2.1 | 40 | 5.6 | ||
| Multifunctional protein (EC 4.2.1.17, EC 1.1.1.35) | - | 625 | 1.3 | ||
| Thiolase (EC 2.3.1.9) | k2.1 | 295 | 10.4 | ||
| ATP citrate synthase (EC 2.3.3.8) | - | 80 | 6.6 | ||
| Aconitate hydratase (EC 4.2.1.3) | k2.2 | 480 | 4.6 | ||
| Isocitrate lyase, glyoxysomal (EC 4.1.3.1) | k2.1 | 1970 | 9.4 | ||
| Malate synthase, glyoxysomal (EC 2.3.3.9) | - | 690 | 2.5 | ||
| Malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37) | k2.2 | 575 | 2.6 | ||
| Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (EC 4.1.1.49) | k2.2 | 475 | 15.3 | ||
| Cysteine proteinase (EC 3.4.22.-) | k2.1 | 1880 | 25.5 | ||
| Cysteine-type endopeptidase (EC 3.4.22.1) | k2.1 | 1700 | 85.0 | ||
| Cysteine proteinase (EC 3.4.22.-) | k2.2 | 505 | 50.5 | ||
a Enzymes and the corresponding transcripts are arranged according the metabolic scheme shown in Figure 5. Relative expression indicates maximal fold of increment during germination.
Figure 5Temporal transcriptional changes of genes involved in starch and lipid mobilization pathways during germination under standard conditions. Enzymes designated by numbers are listed in Table 2. Transcriptional changes of the corresponding genes are depicted as coloured arrows with red indicating at least 2-fold up-regulation and blue indicating at least 2-fold down-regulation.
Figure 6Functional classification of stress-responsive genes. Group I comprises 88 genes showing enhanced mRNA levels under stress conditions, group II consist of 69 genes showing reduced mRNA levels under stress conditions.
Stress-induced transcriptional changes of genes involved in starch and lipid mobilization pathways.a
| Alpha-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) | 3.1** | T1 | ||
| Alpha-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) | 1.9* | T1 | ||
| Beta-amylase (EC 3.2.1.2) | 3.0* | T1 | ||
| Phosphoglucomutase (EC 5.4.2.2), cytosolic | 2.7** | T50 | ||
| Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.1), cytosolic | 1.5 | Tmax | ||
| Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.1), plastidic | 2.0* | T50 | ||
| Triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) (EC 5.3.1.1), cytosolic | 2.2 | T1 | ||
| Phosphoglycerate mutase (PGAM) (EC 5.4.2.1), cytosolic | 2.3* | T1 | ||
| Pyruvate kinase (PK) (EC 2.7.1.40), cytosolic | 1.5 | T1 | ||
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha subunit (EC 1.2.4.1) | 1.8* | T1 | ||
| Alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) | 1.5 | T1 | ||
| Acyl-CoA synthetase (EC 6.2.1.3) | 1.9* | T50 | ||
| Enoyl-CoA hydratase (EC 4.2.1.17) | 0.4** | Tmax | ||
| Thiolase (EC 2.3.1.9) | 0.5*** | Tmax | ||
| ATP citrate synthase (EC 2.3.3.8) | 0.7* | Tmax | ||
| Isocitrate lyase, glyoxysomal (EC 4.1.3.1) | 0.5** | Tmax | ||
| Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (EC 4.1.1.49) | 0.5** | Tmax | ||
a The transcripts are arranged according the metabolic scheme shown in Figures 4 and 5.
* P ≤ 0.05; ** P ≤ 0.01; *** P ≤ 0.001
Figure 7Stress-induced transcriptional changes of genes involved in starch and lipid mobilization pathways. Enzymes designated by numbers are listed in Table 2 and 3. Transcriptional changes are presented as maximal transcript abundance ratios at physiologically identical germination stages (multistress conditions to standard conditions). Red filled or opened arrows indicate enhanced transcript abundance (at least 2-fold or 1.5-fold) under multistress conditions and blue filled or opened arrows indicate reduced transcript abundance (at least 2-fold or 1.5-fold) under multistress conditions.