Literature DB >> 19045657

The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain.

Gitte Keidser1, Harvey Dillon, Elizabeth Convery.   

Abstract

Self-adjustments of variable hearing aid parameters are essential for trainable hearing aids to provide customized amplification for different listening environments. Prompted by a finding of Dreschler et al. [Ear Hear. 29, 214-227 (2008)], this study investigates the effect of the base line (starting) response on self-adjustments of gain in different frequency bands. In a laboratory test, 24 hearing-impaired listeners adjusted the bass, treble, and overall gain to reach their preferred responses from two different base line responses for 12 different listening situations. The adjustments were repeated five times using the preferred response after each adjustment as base line response for the next adjustment. Half of the listeners further compared three different response shapes, within the range of preferred responses, pairwise ten times for preferential and perceptual discrimination. The results revealed that base line response biases were more pronounced at low frequencies and for listeners with a flat hearing loss configuration. While 83% of listeners reliably discriminated between the average selected biased responses, only 25% demonstrated reliable preferences for one response over the other. Listeners who showed preferential discrimination ability were those who were less biased by the base line response. The clinical implication is that self-adjustments should begin from an appropriately prescribed starting response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045657     DOI: 10.1121/1.2951500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

Review 1.  Evidence on self-fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Lena L N Wong
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-04-23

2.  Threshold measurements by self-fitting hearing aids: feasibility and challenges.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Dan Zhou; Lyndal Carter
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03-07

3.  Amplification Self-Adjustment: Controls and Repeatability.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Jennifer Retana; Carol L Mackersie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Trevor T Perry; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Harvey Dillon; Lyndal Carter; Anna O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-11-30

6.  A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.

Authors:  Carol Mackersie; Arthur Boothroyd; Alexandra Lithgow
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Hearing Aid Self-Adjustment: Effects of Formal Speech-Perception Test and Noise.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Arthur Boothroyd; Harinath Garudadri
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Elizabeth Convery
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  A Trainable Hearing Aid Algorithm Reflecting Individual Preferences for Degree of Noise-Suppression, Input Sound Level, and Listening Situation.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Yoon; Kyoung Won Nam; Sunhyun Yook; Baek Hwan Cho; Dong Pyo Jang; Sung Hwa Hong; In Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Elizabeth Convery
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.