Literature DB >> 19041512

Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.

Omid Majdani1, Martin Leinung, Thomas Rau, Arash Akbarian, Martin Zimmerling, Minoo Lenarz, Thomas Lenarz, Robert Labadie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of demagnetization of the magnets and temperature changes in cochlear implants (Cis) in a 3.0 tesla (3.0T) MRI. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Demagnetization and remagnetization measurements were done on magnets for different types of CIs. Temperature of different body and electrode sides was measured in the MRI environment.
RESULTS: Demagnetization of the magnets of the CI is dependent on the angle between the magnetic field of the CI magnet and the MRI. When this angle was greater than 80 degrees, relevant demagnetization occurred and sufficient remagnetization was not possible with the 3.0T MRI magnet. Maximum temperature rise was 0.5 degrees C.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients carrying CIs with non-removable magnets should not enter a 3.0T MRI device in a routine clinical setup. Under special conditions (angle between the two magnets less than 80 degrees) imaging in a 3.0T MRI may be possible without harming the patient or the implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19041512     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  22 in total

1.  [Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients: German version].

Authors:  G Grupe; J Wagner; S Hofmann; A Stratmann; P Mittmann; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients : English version.

Authors:  G Grupe; J Wagner; S Hofmann; A Stratmann; P Mittmann; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Artifacts caused by cochlear implants with non-removable magnets in 3T MRI: phantom and cadaveric studies.

Authors:  Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau; Friedrich Götz; Martin Zimmerling; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz; Robert Labadie; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  [Alteration of flux density of highly coercive SmCo magnets used in prosthodontics and epithetics in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI].

Authors:  Buu-Tai Truong; Felix H Blankenstein
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; A Sufana Iancu; C Vincent; G Tourrel; O Ernst
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with magnetic hearing implants: overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; W Mann; A Keilmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.

Authors:  Martin Leinung; Andreas G Loth; Michaela Kroth; Iris Burck; Timo Stöver; Silke Helbig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.