Literature DB >> 19039822

Offer and uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in women from different social and ethnic backgrounds.

Rachel Rowe1, David Puddicombe, Christine Hockley, Maggie Redshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare offer and uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in women from different social and ethnic backgrounds.
METHOD: A total of 4800 randomly selected women in England were sent a survey three months after they had given birth; 2960 women responded. Odds ratios (OR) for reported offer and uptake of screening comparing women by area deprivation and ethnicity were calculated.
RESULTS: In all, 65% of women reported having screening; 89% reported being offered screening, and 69% of these reported taking up the offer. There was no evidence of a difference in the reported offer (adjusted OR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.19, p = 0.41) or uptake (adjusted OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.06, p = 0.15) of screening for women living in the most deprived areas compared with other women. Asian women were less likely to report being offered screening than White women (adjusted OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94, p = 0.02) and were less likely to take up screening when offered (adjusted OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.72, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: While most pregnant women in England are offered prenatal screening for Down syndrome, approximately 1 in 10 is not. Asian women are less likely than White women to report being offered Down syndrome screening and are less likely to have a screening test when offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039822     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  12 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Rates of prenatal screening across health care regions in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Michael Campitelli; Xiaomu Ma; Tianhua Huang; Mark Walker; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Effectiveness of pre-counseling genetic education workshops at a large urban community health center serving low-income Chinese American women.

Authors:  Shao-Chee Sim; Xiaojie Diana Zhou; Laureen D Hom; Christine Chen; Rebecca Sze
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Current trends in Antenatal Screening Services: Results from a regional survey.

Authors:  F Lynn; J McNeill; F Alderdice
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2010-01

5.  Model-based analysis of costs and outcomes of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome using cell free fetal DNA in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Stephen Morris; Saffron Karlsen; Nancy Chung; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Who is actually asked about their mental health in pregnancy and the postnatal period? Findings from a national survey.

Authors:  Maggie Redshaw; Jane Henderson
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Knowledge of Prenatal Screening, Down Syndrome, Amniocentesis, and Related Factors among Iranian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Zahra Jouhari; Ashraf Pirasteh
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-04

8.  Impact of maternal education on the outcome of newborns requiring surgery for congenital malformations.

Authors:  Carmen Dingemann; Martin Sonne; Benno Ure; Bettina Bohnhorst; Constantin von Kaisenberg; Sabine Pirr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Haiyan Gao; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.

Authors:  Alexandra Maftei; Oana Dănilă
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.