Literature DB >> 19036863

Fusimotor drive may adjust muscle spindle feedback to task requirements in humans.

Edith Ribot-Ciscar1, Valérie Hospod, Jean-Pierre Roll, Jean-Marc Aimonetti.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the fusimotor control of muscle spindle sensitivity may depend on the movement parameter the task is focused on, either the velocity or the final position reached. The unitary activities of 18 muscle spindle afferents were recorded by microneurography at the common peroneal nerve. We compared in two situations the responses of muscle spindle afferents to ankle movements imposed while the subject was instructed not to pay attention to or to pay attention to the movement, both in the absence of visual cues. In the two situations, three ramp-and-hold movements were imposed in random order. In one situation, the three movements differed by their velocity and in the other by the final position reached. The task consisted in ranking the three movements according to the parameter under consideration (for example, slow, fast, and medium). The results showed that paying attention to movement velocity gave rise to a significant increase in the dynamic and static responses of muscle afferents. In contrast, focusing attention on the final position reached made the muscle spindle feedback better discriminate the different positions and depressed its capacity to discriminate movement velocities. Changes are interpreted as reflecting dynamic and static gamma activation, respectively. The present results support the view that the fusimotor drive depends on the parameter the task is focused on, so that the muscle afferent feedback is adjusted to the task requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19036863     DOI: 10.1152/jn.91041.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Rita Azzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of White Noise Achilles Tendon Vibration on Quiet Standing and Active Postural Positioning.

Authors:  Carly C Sacco; Erin M Gaffney; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Changes in muscle spindle firing in response to length changes of neighboring muscles.

Authors:  Hiltsje A Smilde; Jake A Vincent; Guus C Baan; Paul Nardelli; Johannes C Lodder; Huibert D Mansvelder; Tim C Cope; Huub Maas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Emergence of gamma motor activity in an artificial neural network model of the corticospinal system.

Authors:  Bernard Grandjean; Marc A Maier
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Altered visual strategies and attention are related to increased force fluctuations during a pinch grip task in older adults.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Wendy E Huddleston; Bradley E Ernest
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Relating reflex gain modulation in posture control to underlying neural network properties using a neuromusculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Jasper Schuurmans; Frans C T van der Helm; Alfred C Schouten
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Vibrotactile cuing revisited to reveal a possible challenge to sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Timothy A Thrasher; Charles S Layne; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.