Literature DB >> 19036165

Loss of PTEN expression is associated with colorectal cancer liver metastasis and poor patient survival.

Hirozumi Sawai1, Akira Yasuda, Nobuo Ochi, Jiachi Ma, Yoichi Matsuo, Takehiro Wakasugi, Hiroki Takahashi, Hitoshi Funahashi, Mikinori Sato, Hiromitsu Takeyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is an important negative regulator of cell-survival signaling. To evaluate the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases, we investigated PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer liver metastases.
METHODS: Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were analyzed immunohistochemically, and the correlation between immunohistochemical findings and clinicopathological factors was investigated. Seventy primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases were used as controls.
RESULTS: PTEN was strongly expressed in 44 (62.9%) colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases. In contrast, PTEN was weakly expressed in 52 (75.4%) primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients with liver metastases, and was absent in liver metastases. Weak PTEN expression in colorectal cancer tissues was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage (p < 0.01) and lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). PTEN expression was significantly stronger in primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases. Furthermore, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with positive PTEN expression compared to those with negative PTEN expression (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that loss of PTEN expression is involved with colorectal cancer aggressive capacity and that diagnostic evaluation of PTEN expression may provide valuable prognostic information to aid treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19036165      PMCID: PMC2611992          DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1471-230X            Impact factor:   3.067


Background

Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries, with liver metastases being the primary cause of death in most patients [1]. Despite improved cancer screening methods and adjuvant treatment regimens for primary colorectal cancer, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases remain a critical problem [2,3]. Approximately 40% of patients who develop metastatic disease have tumour(s) confined to the liver, which has driven interest in regional therapies that target the liver [4]. An essential process for promotion of metastasis is cancer cell invasion, which is controlled by several biological factors, most notably tumour proliferation and invasion. The tumour suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a critical negative regulator of the cell-survival signaling pathway initiated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) [5-9]. The PI3K-PTEN pathway promotes cell survival and proliferation, increases in cell size, and chemoresistance. Each of these biological outcomes results from the interaction of this pathway with other signaling networks. Further, loss of PTEN expression has been reported to be strongly associated with aggressive tumour features [10-13]. Controlling liver metastasis is considered essential in the treatment of colorectal cancer. It is therefore reasonable to expect that evaluation of PTEN expression levels in primary colorectal cancer and in liver metastases may provide information that will allow better prediction of therapy benefit. The aims of this study were to investigate PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and in colorectal cancer liver metastases and to evaluate the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases. Our results suggest that loss of PTEN expression is associated with the aggressive capacity of colorectal cancer and that understanding the biologic mechanisms responsible for regulation of PTEN expression may enable better translational treatment of colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were analyzed in this study. Seventy primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastasis were used as controls. All tissues were obtained in the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Hospital with informed consent from patients or their relatives. Tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin and subsequently embedded in paraffin.

Immunohistochemistry

Resected colorectal cancer and paired liver metastasis tissue specimens were sliced into 3.5-μm-thick sections and deparaffinized in five min. After blocking nonspecific binding with 10% bovine serum (Wako, Osaka, Japan), sections were incubated with anti-PTEN antibodies (clone 28H6; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 1:300 dilution for 60 min at room temperature. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the peroxidase-based EnVision™ kit (DakoCytomation, Copenhagen, Denmark) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Negative control sections were prepared using normal mouse IgG instead of primary antibody.

Immunohistochemical evaluation

Two observers (H.Ta. and H.S.) independently evaluated the immunohistochemical staining results. The concordance ratio was >90%. Differences of opinion were resolved by reaching a consensus with the assistance of a third evaluator (H.Tb.). The intensity of tissue staining was graded semiquantitatively on a 4-point scale (-, +, ++, and +++). Likewise, the proportion of cells stained was assessed on a 4-point scale (1, 0–15%; 2, 15–50%; 3, 50–85%; 4, 85–100% cells stained). Tissues were classified into strongly staining (Group S) and weakly staining (Group W) groups according to the intensity and proportion of immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical staining of intensity more than +++ or a staining area > 3 was classified as Group S, the intensity less than ++ and a staining area < 2 was classified as Group W.

Statistical analysis

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare clinicopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics. Differences between Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression were tested with the Wilcoxon test. Statistical significance was indicated by p < 0.05 or 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.).

Results

Clinicopathological findings of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis

Sixty-nine pairs of primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens were evaluated (Table 1). The mean age of all patients was 60.7 ± 9.9 years. pT, pN, and pM categories were determined according to the TNM classification [14]. The M category was determined from preoperative imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and postoperative imaging findings. A total of 23 patients had synchronous liver metastases and 46 had metachronous metastases; 38 patients had solitary liver metastases and 31 patients had multiple (≥ 2) metastases. Some patients received postoperative treatment; however, there was no difference in outcome between the various treatment modalities. The median follow-up time for patients at the time of survival analysis was 35.5 months after primary surgery. The actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases was 34.3%.
Table 1

Comparison of clinicopathological findings by existence of liver metastases

Patients with liver metastases n = 69 (cases)Patients without liver metastases n = 70 (cases)p value
GenderM/F40/2938/32N.S.
AgeYears60.7 ± 9.962.5 ± 10.1N.S.
TNM stageI/II/III/IV0/12/23/3411/38/21/0< 0.01a
Tumour siteC/R45/2449/21N.S.
LN metsYes/No41/2831/39N.S.
Differentiationw/mod/por37/30/221/33/16N.S.
Liver metsSync/Meta23/46N.A.N.A.
No. of liver metsSolo/Multi38/31N.A.N.A.
PTEN expressionS/W17/5244/26< 0.01a
Median follow-upMonths35.5 ± 27.437.2 ± 39.9N.S.
5-year survival(%)34.379.2< 0.01b

LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis; Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; S, strong; W, weak; N.A., not applicable; N.S., not significant. The a p-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The b p-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Comparison of clinicopathological findings by existence of liver metastases LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis; Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; S, strong; W, weak; N.A., not applicable; N.S., not significant. The a p-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The b p-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Immunohistochemical localization of PTEN in colorectal cancer and liver metastasis specimens

PTEN expression was evaluated in primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastasis specimens. PTEN was strongly expressed in 44 (62.9%) colorectal cancer specimens from patients without liver metastases (control, n = 70). In contrast, weak PTEN expression was observed in 52 (75.4%) primary colorectal cancer specimens from patients with liver metastases, and PTEN expression was absent in liver metastasis cancer specimens (Figure 1A–D). The marked nuclear staining of PTEN and slight cytoplasmic staining were observed. Weak PTEN expression was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis (Table 2). The actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases and positive PTEN expression was 64.4%. In contrast, the actuarial 5-year survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases and negative PTEN expression was 12.7% (Figure 2). In addition, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, there was a significant difference in 5-year survival rate between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression (p = 0.012).
Figure 1

Expression of PTEN in colon cancer specimens. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a monoclonal anti-PTEN antibody (A, C) or negative control antibody (B) on a section sequential to that used in (A). (A) Strong PTEN expression in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients without associated liver metastasis (×100). (C) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients with liver metastasis (×100). (D) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a specimen from metastatic liver tumor, in contrast, PTEN expression is observed in normal liver tissue (×100).

Table 2

Comparison of clinicopathological findings by PTEN expression

PTEN expression
Group S (n = 17)Group W (n = 52)p value
GenderM/F10/730/22N.S.
AgeYear60.3 ± 9.760.9 ± 10.1N.S.
TNM stageI/II/III/IV0/6/7/40/6/16/30< 0.01a
Tumour siteC/R11/634/18N.S.
LN metsYes/No8/939/13< 0.05a
Differentiationw/mod/por10/7/027/23/2N.S.
Liver metsSync/Meta4/1319/33N.S.
No. of liver metsSolo/Multi9/829/23N.S.
5-year survival(%)64.412.7< 0.05b

LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis, Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; N.S., not significant. The ap-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The bp-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. A comparison of survival curves between cases with (thick line) and without (broken line) strong PTEN expression.

Expression of PTEN in colon cancer specimens. Immunohistochemistry was performed using a monoclonal anti-PTEN antibody (A, C) or negative control antibody (B) on a section sequential to that used in (A). (A) Strong PTEN expression in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients without associated liver metastasis (×100). (C) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a representative moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma specimen from colon cancer patients with liver metastasis (×100). (D) Expression of PTEN is not observed in a specimen from metastatic liver tumor, in contrast, PTEN expression is observed in normal liver tissue (×100). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. A comparison of survival curves between cases with (thick line) and without (broken line) strong PTEN expression. Comparison of clinicopathological findings by PTEN expression LN, lymph node; mets, metastasis; M, male; F, female; C, colon; R, rectum; w, well differentiated adenocarcinoma; mod, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma; por, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma; Sync, synchronous metastasis; Meta, metachronous metastasis, Solo, solitary metastasis; Multi, multiple metastases; N.S., not significant. The ap-values were obtained using the Mann-Whiteny U test. The bp-values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on PTEN expression tested with the Wilcoxon test. Values of age are given mean ± s.d. N.S., not significant.

Discussion

PTEN is a potent tumour suppressor gene that is frequently mutated in a large number of human cancers, including brain, endometrial, prostate, and kidney cancer. PTEN downregulates the activity of the lipid second messenger phosphoinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) through dephosphorylation, thereby negatively regulating PI3K-triggered signaling. The PI3K/Akt pathway is an important driver of cell proliferation and survival, most notably in cells responding to growth factor receptor engagement. Survival signals such as growth factors, cytokines, and hormones are known to activate PI3K [15]. Subsequently, PI3K activates Akt/PKB, which interferes with cellular apoptotic machinery [16]. Activated Akt/PKB mediates cell survival via the regulation of numerous proteins involved in apoptosis, such as the transcription factor NF-κB [17]. Akt-triggered survival signaling is suppressed by PTEN antagonization of PI3K activity. PI3K and Akt are overexpressed in a variety of cancers [18,19], while PTEN is frequently deleted in advanced tumours [20,21]. These alterations lead to constitutively active survival signaling that enhances the insensitivity of tumour cells to apoptosis induction. Via PI3K antagonism, PTEN functions as a tumour suppressor. Thus, the PI3K-PTEN signaling network is crucial to proper regulation of cell survival. By reducing PI3K activity, PTEN inhibits the recruitment of Akt to the plasma membrane and prevents its activation. PTEN function is regulated by post-translational modification, cellular localization, and redox modulation of its active-site cysteine [22,23]. When PTEN is deleted, mutated, or otherwise inactivated, activation of PI3K effectors – particularly the key survival kinase Akt/PKB – can occur in the absence of any exogenous stimuli, allowing tumourigenesis to be initiated. The molecular mechanisms by which PTEN controls stem cell behavior are currently unknown. Previously, PTEN loss has been reported to lead to an increase in self-renewal and proliferation in neural stem cells [24], at least in part, by modulating the G0 to G1 cell cycle transition, a critical step for stem cell self-renewal and differentiation [25]. Studies of mouse embryonic fibroblasts and B lymphocytes lacking the PTEN gene have demonstrated that these cells migrate faster than their wild-type counterparts in culture, indicating a physiological role for PTEN in the suppression of cell motility [26,27]. Re-introduction of PTEN into mammalian cells lacking the enzyme inhibits the motility of several cell lineages, including mouse embryo fibroblasts and tumour-derived cells of glial, prostate, and T cell origin [25,27-30]; however, the majority of these studies have not addressed the biologic mechanism of PTEN action. Numerous tumour types, including sporadic tumours and those that arise in association with a cancer predisposition syndrome, demonstrate either absent or altered PTEN expression [31]. Recent reports demonstrated the relationship between PTEN expression and the efficacy of cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [32-34]. Frattini et al reported the loss of PTEN expression is observed in 40 % of primary colorectal cancer patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic lesion and the loss of PTEN protein expression is associated with nonresponsiveness to cetuximab [32]. They also demonstrated a trend toward PTEN protein reduction in mucinous colorectal cancers, compared with well-differentiated tumors. In this study, we investigated PTEN expression in primary colorectal cancer and in colorectal cancer liver metastases and evaluated the correlation between PTEN expression and clinicopathological characteristics of colorectal cancer patients with and without liver metastases. In our immunohistochemical analysis, strong PTEN expression was observed in 62.9% of primary colorectal cancer specimens obtained from patients without liver metastases, while weak PTEN expression was observed in 75.4% of colorectal cancer specimens obtained from patients with liver metastases. In addition, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, we found that weak PTEN expression was significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases, a significant difference in 5-year survival rate was observed between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression. This is the first report to demonstrate an association between poor prognosis and PTEN expression in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that weak PTEN expression is significantly associated with advanced TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. This is the first report to demonstrate a significant difference in 5-year survival rate between patients with positive PTEN expression and those with negative PTEN expression among colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. These observations suggest that diagnostic evaluation of PTEN expression might provide valuable prognostic information to aid treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients.

List of abbreviations

PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PIP3: phosphoinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

HS, AY, NO, HTakahashi, MS, and HTakeyama conducted clinical examinations and surgery. HS, TW, YM, HF, and JM performed pathological analysis. HS, HTakahashi, and AY participated in the design of the study. HS and HTakeyamaconceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:
  33 in total

Review 1.  Cellular survival: a play in three Akts.

Authors:  S R Datta; A Brunet; M E Greenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Inhibition of cell migration, spreading, and focal adhesions by tumor suppressor PTEN.

Authors:  M Tamura; J Gu; K Matsumoto; S Aota; R Parsons; K M Yamada
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Wortmannin inhibits growth of human non-small-cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Arnd Steffen Boehle; Roland Kurdow; Lars Boenicke; Bodo Schniewind; Fred Faendrich; Peter Dohrmann; Holger Kalthoff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2002-09-28       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Reversible inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN by H2O2.

Authors:  Seung-Rock Lee; Kap-Seok Yang; Jaeyul Kwon; Chunghee Lee; Woojin Jeong; Sue Goo Rhee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Negative regulation of neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation by the Pten tumor suppressor gene in vivo.

Authors:  M Groszer; R Erickson; D D Scripture-Adams; R Lesche; A Trumpp; J A Zack; H I Kornblum; X Liu; H Wu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  PTEN: one gene, many syndromes.

Authors:  Charis Eng
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  AKT2, a putative oncogene encoding a member of a subfamily of protein-serine/threonine kinases, is amplified in human ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  J Q Cheng; A K Godwin; A Bellacosa; T Taguchi; T F Franke; T C Hamilton; P N Tsichlis; J R Testa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  PIK3CA mutation/PTEN expression status predicts response of colon cancer cells to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab.

Authors:  Minaxi Jhawer; Sanjay Goel; Andrew J Wilson; Cristina Montagna; Yi-He Ling; Do-Sun Byun; Shannon Nasser; Diego Arango; Joongho Shin; Lidija Klampfer; Leonard H Augenlicht; Roman Perez-Soler; Roman Perez Soler; John M Mariadason
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction.

Authors:  B M Burgering; P J Coffer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Critical roles of Pten in B cell homeostasis and immunoglobulin class switch recombination.

Authors:  Akira Suzuki; Tsuneyasu Kaisho; Minako Ohishi; Manae Tsukio-Yamaguchi; Takeshi Tsubata; Pandelakis A Koni; Takehiko Sasaki; Tak Wah Mak; Toru Nakano
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  51 in total

1.  Phosphatase and tensin homolog expression related to cetuximab effects in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Shen; Jian Yang; Zhi Xu; Dong-Ying Gu; Jin-Fei Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  MicroRNA-92a functions as an oncogene in colorectal cancer by targeting PTEN.

Authors:  Guangjun Zhang; He Zhou; Huaxu Xiao; Zuoliang Liu; Hongpeng Tian; Tong Zhou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Crosstalk between Wnt/β-catenin and Hedgehog/Gli signaling pathways in colon cancer and implications for therapy.

Authors:  Li Song; Zhuo-Yu Li; Wei-Ping Liu; Mei-Rong Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Restoration of PTEN activity decreases metastases in an orthotopic model of colon cancer.

Authors:  Sanjib Chowdhury; Melanie Ongchin; Guanghua Wan; Elizabeth Sharratt; Michael G Brattain; Ashwani Rajput
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  The role of personalized medicine in metastatic colorectal cancer: an evolving landscape.

Authors:  Sing Yu Moorcraft; Elizabeth C Smyth; David Cunningham
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 7.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

8.  Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 9.  MicroRNAs: Novel immunotherapeutic targets in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Jing Nie; Qian Mei; Wei-Dong Han
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  PTEN phosphatase-independent maintenance of glandular morphology in a predictive colorectal cancer model system.

Authors:  Ishaan C Jagan; Ravi K Deevi; Aliya Fatehullah; Rebecca Topley; Joshua Eves; Michael Stevenson; Maurice Loughrey; Kenneth Arthur; Frederick Charles Campbell
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.