Literature DB >> 19034694

Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.

Magda Budzowska1, Roland Kanaar.   

Abstract

During every S phase, cells need to duplicate their genomes so that both daughter cells inherit complete copies of genetic information. Given the large size of mammalian genomes and the required precision of DNA replication, genome duplication requires highly fine-tuned corrective and quality control processes. A major threat to the accuracy and efficiency of DNA synthesis is the presence of DNA lesions, caused by both endogenous and exogenous damaging agents. Replicative DNA polymerases, which carry out the bulk of DNA synthesis, evolved to do their job extremely precisely and efficiently. However, they are unable to use damaged DNA as a template and, consequently, are stopped at most DNA lesions. Failure to restart such stalled replication forks can result in major chromosomal aberrations and lead to cell dysfunction or death. Therefore, a well-coordinated response to replication perturbation is essential for cell survival and fitness. Here we review how this response involves activating checkpoint signaling and the use of specialized pathways promoting replication restart. Checkpoint signaling adjusts cell cycle progression to the emergency situation and thus gives cells more time to deal with the damage. Replication restart is mediated by two pathways. Homologous recombination uses homologous DNA sequence to repair or bypass the lesion and is therefore mainly error free. Error-prone translesion synthesis employs specialized, low fidelity polymerases to bypass the damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034694     DOI: 10.1007/s12013-008-9039-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 1085-9195            Impact factor:   2.194


  64 in total

1.  Distinct roles of FANCO/RAD51C protein in DNA damage signaling and repair: implications for Fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Kumar Somyajit; Shreelakshmi Subramanya; Ganesh Nagaraju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Tumor hypoxia and genetic alterations in sporadic cancers.

Authors:  Minoru Koi; Clement R Boland
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  The MMS22L-TONSL complex mediates recovery from replication stress and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Lara O'Donnell; Stephanie Panier; Jan Wildenhain; Johnny M Tkach; Abdallah Al-Hakim; Marie-Claude Landry; Cristina Escribano-Diaz; Rachel K Szilard; Jordan T F Young; Meagan Munro; Marella D Canny; Nadine K Kolas; Wei Zhang; Shane M Harding; Jarkko Ylanko; Megan Mendez; Michael Mullin; Thomas Sun; Bianca Habermann; Alessandro Datti; Robert G Bristow; Anne-Claude Gingras; Michael D Tyers; Grant W Brown; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  High levels of RAD51 perturb DNA replication elongation and cause unscheduled origin firing due to impaired CHK1 activation.

Authors:  Ann Christin Parplys; Jasna Irena Seelbach; Saskia Becker; Matthias Behr; Agnieszka Wrona; Camilla Jend; Wael Yassin Mansour; Simon Andreas Joosse; Horst-Werner Stuerzbecher; Helmut Pospiech; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey; Kerstin Borgmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  The SNM1B/APOLLO DNA nuclease functions in resolution of replication stress and maintenance of common fragile site stability.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mason; Ishita Das; Martin Arlt; Neil Patel; Stephanie Kraftson; Thomas W Glover; JoAnn M Sekiguchi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Translesion synthesis of abasic sites by yeast DNA polymerase epsilon.

Authors:  Nasim Sabouri; Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  More forks on the road to replication stress recovery.

Authors:  Chris Allen; Amanda K Ashley; Robert Hromas; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.216

8.  Genome stability control by checkpoint regulation of tRNA gene transcription.

Authors:  Brett W Clelland; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2010-09-23

9.  DNA-PK phosphorylation of RPA32 Ser4/Ser8 regulates replication stress checkpoint activation, fork restart, homologous recombination and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Amanda K Ashley; Meena Shrivastav; Jingyi Nie; Courtney Amerin; Kyle Troksa; Jason G Glanzer; Shengqin Liu; Stephen O Opiyo; Diana D Dimitrova; Phuong Le; Brock Sishc; Susan M Bailey; Greg G Oakley; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-10

10.  Mutations in Replicative Stress Response Pathways Are Associated with S Phase-specific Defects in Nucleotide Excision Repair.

Authors:  François Bélanger; Jean-Philippe Angers; Émile Fortier; Ian Hammond-Martel; Santiago Costantino; Elliot Drobetsky; Hugo Wurtele
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.