Literature DB >> 11888463

Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.

Franc H Hetzer1, Nicolas Demartines, Alexander E Handschin, Pierre-Alain Clavien.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy offers several advantages over excision hemorrhoidectomy, including reduced postoperative pain, a reduced hospital stay, and an earlier recovery time. Furthermore, stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with lower hemorrhoidal recurrence on long-term follow-up.
DESIGN: A randomized prospective trial. Patients were blinded to the operation technique used. Follow-up occurred at 1 and 3 weeks and 12 months postoperatively.
SETTING: A university hospital providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care. PATIENTS: Forty patients with second- and third-degree hemorrhoid disease were randomized to undergo either stapled or excision hemorrhoidectomy. Two patients were excluded. All patients were subject to a follow-up examination.
INTERVENTIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (Longo technique) vs excision hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, postoperative pain (measured by the visual analog scale), hospital stay, histologic features, morbidity, defecation habit, continence, recovery time (return to work), and hemorrhoid recurrence at 1 year.
RESULTS: Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy was associated with a significantly reduced operating time (30 vs 43.25 minutes; P<.001), reduced postoperative pain scores (visual analog score) on the first 4 postoperative days (day 1: 2.7 vs 6.3; day 2: 1.7 vs 6.3; day 3: 0.8 vs 5.4; and day 4: 0.5 vs 4.8, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10, maximum pain; P < or = .001), and an earlier return to work (6.7 vs 20.7 days;P =.001). There were no differences for stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy in length of hospital stay (2.4 vs 2.1 days), complications (3 [15%] of 20 patients vs 5 [25%] of 20 patients), and recurrence rate (1 [5%] of 20 patients vs 1 [5%] of 20 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with reduced postoperative pain, earlier recovery time and return to work, and a similar recurrence rate compared with the excision technique. Provided further clinical trials confirm these findings, stapled hemorrhoidectomy may become a future gold standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11888463     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.3.337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  47 in total

1.  Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)--a report from China.

Authors:  Liqin Yao; Yunshi Zhong; Jianmin Xu; Meidong Xu; Pinghong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza-H Remzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Long-Term Results After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A 15-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ralph Schneider; Pia Jäger; Andreas Ommer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparison of clinical effects between warm water spray and sitz bath in post-hemorrhoidectomy period.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Hsu; Jen-Shu Chia; Shu-Wen Jao; Chang-Chieh Wu; Hsiang-Yu Yang; Chen-Ming Mai; Chun-Yu Fu; Cheng-Wen Hsiao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evaluation of the effectiveness and patients' contentment with transanal haemorrhoidal artery dearterialisation and mucopexy (THD) for treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a 6-year study.

Authors:  Qurat Ul Ain; Yasir Bashir; Emmanuel Eguare
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  A prospective randomized double-blind study of pain control by topical calcium channel blockers versus placebo after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Sunandan Yadav; Radha Govind Khandelwal; Prabha Om; K Ravindra; Kanhaiya Lal Choudhary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage.

Authors:  Marc Singer; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

9.  Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Amy Halverson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

Review 10.  Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Georgia Dedemadi; Arnold Radtke; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Thalis Christofides; Andreas D Rink; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.