Literature DB >> 19034438

Attention modulates the specificity of automatic imitation to human actors.

Matthew R Longo1, Bennett I Bertenthal.   

Abstract

The perception of actions performed by others activates one's own motor system. Recent studies disagree as to whether this effect is specific to actions performed by other humans, an issue complicated by differences in perceptual salience between human and non-human stimuli. We addressed this issue by examining the automatic imitation of actions stimulated by viewing a virtual, computer-generated, hand. This stimulus was held constant across conditions, but participants' attention to the virtualness of the hand was manipulated by informing some participants during instructions that they would see a "computer-generated model of a hand," while making no mention of this to others. In spite of this attentional manipulation, participants in both conditions were generally aware of the virtualness of the hand. Nevertheless, automatic imitation of the virtual hand was significantly reduced--but not eliminated--when participants were told they would see a virtual hand. These results demonstrate that attention modulates the "human bias" of automatic imitation to non-human actors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034438     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1649-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of 'theory of mind' in verbal and nonverbal tasks.

Authors:  H L Gallagher; F Happé; N Brunswick; P C Fletcher; U Frith; C D Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The body-inversion effect.

Authors:  Catherine L Reed; Valerie E Stone; Senia Bozova; James Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-07

3.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation.

Authors:  J Grezes
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Modulation of the mirror system by social relevance.

Authors:  James M Kilner; Jennifer L Marchant; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; D Yves Von Cramon; Marcel Brass
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Adam Kosobud; Bennett I Bertenthal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Geoffrey Bird; Rüdiger Flach; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-12

9.  The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions.

Authors:  V Gazzola; G Rizzolatti; B Wicker; C Keysers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action.

Authors:  Clare Press; Helge Gillmeister; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

2.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

4.  Automatic versus voluntary motor imitation: effect of visual context and stimulus velocity.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Natale Stucchi; Marco Jacono; Luciano Fadiga; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?

Authors:  Romy Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-05-09

6.  Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel Joel Shaw; Martin Lamoš; Beáta Špiláková; Miguel Salazar; Milan Brázdil
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The body knows what it should do: automatic motor compensation for illusory heaviness contagion.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai; Eriko Sugimori; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-13

8.  Visuomotor resonance in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Cristina Becchio; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-22

9.  What is social about social perception research?

Authors:  Christoph Teufel; Elisabeth von dem Hagen; Kate C Plaisted-Grant; James J Edmonds; John O Ayorinde; Paul C Fletcher; Greg Davis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-25

10.  Effects of context on visuomotor interference depends on the perspective of observed actions.

Authors:  Marta Bortoletto; Jason B Mattingley; Ross Cunnington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.