Literature DB >> 17698489

Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action.

Clare Press1, Helge Gillmeister, Cecilia Heyes.   

Abstract

Recent research in cognitive neuroscience has found that observation of human actions activates the 'mirror system' and provokes automatic imitation to a greater extent than observation of non-biological movements. The present study investigated whether this human bias depends primarily on phylogenetic or ontogenetic factors by examining the effects of sensorimotor experience on automatic imitation of non-biological robotic, stimuli. Automatic imitation of human and robotic action stimuli was assessed before and after training. During these test sessions, participants were required to execute a pre-specified response (e.g. to open their hand) while observing a human or robotic hand making a compatible (opening) or incompatible (closing) movement. During training, participants executed opening and closing hand actions while observing compatible (group CT) or incompatible movements (group IT) of a robotic hand. Compatible, but not incompatible, training increased automatic imitation of robotic stimuli (speed of responding on compatible trials, compared with incompatible trials) and abolished the human bias observed at pre-test. These findings suggest that the development of the mirror system depends on sensorimotor experience, and that, in our species, it is biased in favour of human action stimuli because these are more abundant than non-biological action stimuli in typical developmental environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698489      PMCID: PMC2275887          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Causes and consequences of imitation.

Authors:  C Heyes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.

Authors:  Laurie Carr; Marco Iacoboni; Marie-Charlotte Dubeau; John C Mazziotta; Gian Luigi Lenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Activation of the human primary motor cortex during observation of tool use.

Authors:  Juha Järveläinen; Martin Schürmann; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements.

Authors:  Massimo Gangitano; Felix M Mottaghy; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.

Authors:  G Buccino; F Binkofski; G R Fink; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; R J Seitz; K Zilles; G Rizzolatti; H J Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem?

Authors:  Marcel Brass; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; D E Glaser; J Grèzes; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Geoffrey Bird; Rüdiger Flach; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-12

10.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.

Authors:  V Gallese; A Goldman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  How does visuomotor priming differ for biological and non-biological stimuli? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  E Gowen; E Poliakoff
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-07

Review 2.  Grist and mills: on the cultural origins of cultural learning.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Does motor interference arise from mirror system activation? The effect of prior visuo-motor practice on automatic imitation.

Authors:  Rémi L Capa; Peter J Marshall; Thomas F Shipley; Robin N Salesse; Cédric A Bouquet
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-29

4.  Perceiving nonverbal behavior: neural correlates of processing movement fluency and contingency in dyadic interactions.

Authors:  Alexandra L Georgescu; Bojana Kuzmanovic; Natacha S Santos; Ralf Tepest; Gary Bente; Marc Tittgemeyer; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kanakogi; Shoji Itakura
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Sensorimotor training modulates automatic imitation of visual speech.

Authors:  Yuchunzi Wu; Bronwen G Evans; Patti Adank
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

7.  Orthogonal-compatibility effects confound automatic imitation: implications for measuring self-other distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Kristína Czekóová; Michaela Porubanová
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-10-17

8.  Automatic imitation in budgerigars.

Authors:  Rosetta Mui; Mark Haselgrove; John Pearce; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system.

Authors:  Caroline Catmur; Vincent Walsh; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Observing human interaction with physical devices.

Authors:  Cristina Massen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.