Literature DB >> 19034282

Tobacco smoking, body mass index, hypertension, and kidney cancer risk in central and eastern Europe.

P Brennan1, O van der Hel, L E Moore, D Zaridze, V Matveev, I Holcatova, V Janout, H Kollarova, L Foretova, N Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D Mates, N Rothman, P Boffetta, W-H Chow.   

Abstract

In a case-control study of kidney cancer in four central European countries, with 1097 incident cases and 1476 controls, we found an increased risk for self-reported hypertension and for obesity. Additional unknown risk factors are likely to be responsible for the high rates of kidney cancer in this region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034282      PMCID: PMC2600689          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Kidney cancer accounts for 1.9% of all malignancies, with approximately 189 000 new cases diagnosed globally each year and the incidence varying more than 10-fold around the world, with the highest rates generally observed in central European countries and among blacks in the United States (Murai and Oya, 2004). Smoking is an established risk factor, although the increase in risk is moderate (IARC, 2004). Other possible risk factors are hypertension and obesity, with potentially differing risks for men and women (Shapiro ; Bergstrom ). To examine the risk factors for kidney cancer in central Europe, we conducted a large multicenter case–control study in Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, and Romania. We present here data on the role of smoking, hypertension, and body mass index (BMI) in this high-risk population.

Materials and methods

This hospital-based case–control study was conducted in seven centres (Moscow (Russia), Bucharest (Romania), Lodz (Poland), and Prague, Olomouc, Ceske Budejovice, and Brno (Czech Republic)). A total of 1097 newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, renal parenchymal cancers (ICD-O-2 code C64) between 20 and 79 years of age were recruited during August 1999 and January 2003. Trained medical staff reviewed medical records to extract relevant diagnostic information, including date and method of diagnosis, histologic type, tumour location, stage, and grade. Eligible controls (n=1476) were admitted to the same hospitals as the cases for conditions unrelated to smoking or genitourinary disorders (except for benign prostatic hyperplasia) between August 1998 and March 2003. No single disease made up more than 20% of the control group. Both cases and controls had to be residents of the study areas for at least 1 year. The response rate for cases ranged from 90 to 98.6% and for the controls, 90.3–96.1%. Trained interviewers used standardised questionnaires at all centres to elicit information on demographic background, smoking, alcohol drinking, dietary practices, height, weight, medical history, family history of cancer, residential history, and occupational history. Smoking status (never smoker, former smoker, current smoker) was defined as status 2 years before interview. Packyears were used as a measure of cumulative tobacco smoking and were calculated by the number of cigarettes smoked per day multiplied by years of smoking and divided by 20. History of hypertension was self-reported and a positive history was restricted to patients who reported being treated for hypertension. The weight in kilograms was ascertained for 2 years before the interview. Body mass index was calculated by dividing the weight by the square of the height in metres. Kidney cancer risks were estimated by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for age (5-years interval), smoking (current, former, and never smokers), BMI in five categories (<25, 25–27.4, 27.5–29.9, 30–34.9, ⩾35), history of hypertension treatment (no vs yes), and country, where appropriate. Heterogeneity tests were used to evaluate differences among countries by including country–exposure interaction terms in the logistic models, and likelihood ratio tests to evaluate the statistical significance of the interaction terms.

Results

The study population consisted of 1097 kidney cancer cases (648 men and 449 women) and 1476 controls (952 men and 524 women) (Tables 1 and 2). Among cases, tumour stage at diagnosis was similar for both sexes, with 9.2% of men and 6.9% of women having M1 stage and 10.3% of men and 8.8% of women having ⩾N1 stage, 83% of cases were clear cell carcinoma and 6% papillary carcinoma.
Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of cases and controls

  Men
Women
  Cases
Controls
Cases
Controls
Variables N % N % N % N %
Country
 Romania639.710911.4327.1519.7
 Poland568.611211.8436.68616.4
 Russia16325.430532.015434.315830.2
 Czech Republic36656.442644.822049.022943.7
 Total648100952100449100524100
         
Age (years)
 <40254.1252.6143.1183.4
 40–499114.015216.05311.86011.5
 50–5922735.032033.612227.215329.2
 60–6918728.928930.415033.517032.4
 >7011818.016617.411024.412323.5
         
Tumour stage
T-stage        
  T111718.8  9020.5  
  T227544.1  20947.5  
  T321033.6  12628.6  
  T4223.5  153.4  
         
M-stage        
  M048690.8  36393.1  
  M1499.2  276.9  
         
N-stage        
  N050589.7  37191.2  
  N1315.5  245.9  
  N2244.3  102.4  
  N330.5  20.5  
         
Histology
 (Clear cell) Renal cell carcinoma53883.0  37082.4  
 Papillary renal cell carcinoma517.9  204.5  
 Other599.1  5913.1  
Table 2

Odds ratio of kidney cancer for tobacco smoking

  Men
Women
Total
  Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI
Smoking N N    N N    N N   
Never smokers1702321.00Refb3403681.00Ref5106001.00Ref
Former smokers2043020.890.68, 1.1747511.070.69, 1.672513530.880.71, 1.11
Current smokers2734160.990.76, 1.29601050.700.48, 1.023335210.870.71, 1.07
             
Never smokers1702321.00Ref3403681.00Ref5106001.00Ref
<17 packyears1502210.940.70, 1.2662970.760.52, 1.112123180.850.67, 1.06
17–31 packyears1612341.000.75, 1.3432390.990.59, 1.651932730.950.74, 1.21
>31 packyears1652610.890.67, 1.1913190.850.40, 1.781782800.850.66, 1.09
   P-value for trend 0.49  P-value for trend 0.34  P-value for trend 0.19

Adjusted for age, body mass index, history of hypertension and country.

Ref=reference category.

Smoking was not associated with an increased risk of kidney cancer, and no dose–response was seen with increasing levels of cigarette consumption. The findings were similar for all patients combined or in men and women separately. In addition, no significant heterogeneity between the four countries was observed. Increasing BMI was positively associated with kidney cancer overall (test for linear trend, P=0.011; Table 3). Compared to those with BMI <25, the OR among those with BMI 30–35 was 1.38 (95% CIs: 1.09, 1.75), and among those with BMI ⩾35 was 1.29 (95% CIs: 0.88, 1.89). The excess risks, however, were restricted to men, risk nearly doubling among those in the highest category of BMI (OR=1.72; (95% CIs: 1.01, 2.94)). For women, no increase in risk was observed either overall or in any of the four countries separately. Approximately 14% of cases were estimated to be attributable to a BMI of greater than 25 (95% CI 3–23%).
Table 3

Odds ratio of kidney cancer for BMI

  Men
Women
Total
  Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI
BMI N N    N N    N N   
<251913631.00Refb1361691.00Ref3275321.00Ref
25–27.51662481.190.91, 1.56871150.860.60, 1.252533631.090.88, 1.35
27.5–29.991251671.320.98, 1.7998901.160.80, 1.702232571.311.04, 1.65
30–351331391.701.25, 2.31981110.950.66, 1.382312501.381.09, 1.75
35+32321.721.01, 2.9430370.850.49, 1.4862691.290.88, 1.89
   P-value for trend 0.001  P-value for trend 0.68  P-value for trend 0.011

Adjusted for age, smoking, history of hypertension and country.

Ref=reference category.

An increased risk was observed for patients who reported having been treated for hypertension more than 2 years before interview compared to those who did not (OR=1.25 (95% CIs: 1.06, 1.49)) (Table 4). The effect was more prominent among women (OR=1.47 (95% CIs: 1.11, 1.95)) than men. The results were largely unaltered when hypertension was defined as ever having been diagnosed with hypertension regardless of treatment status. Approximately 9% of cases were estimated to be attributable to hypertension (95% CIs 2–16%).
Table 4

Odds ratio of kidney cancer for history of hypertension

  Men
Women
Total
  Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI Cases Controls ORa 95% CI
History of treated hypertension N N    N N    N N   
No3856071.00Refb2152991.00Ref6009061.00Ref
Yes2623441.120.90, 1.402342251.471.11, 1.954965691.251.06, 1.49

Adjusted for age, smoking, BMI and country.

Ref=reference category.

Our analysis included all histological types of carcinoma of the renal parenchyma, including 17% of cases who had an histology other than clear cell type, excluding these cases had little influence on the results.

Discussion

This study provides evidence that increased BMI and a history of hypertension are risk factors for kidney cancer in high-risk areas of central and eastern Europe, countries in which data on kidney cancer have been limited. The increased risk associated with BMI was more pronounced among men, while the increased risk for history of hypertension was more pronounced among women. Our findings of increasing risks for kidney cancer with increasing BMI agree with most other studies. A recent evaluation by an IARC working group on the effects of body weight and adiposity showed that all but one of the 19 reviewed studies found a more than two-fold increase in kidney cancer risk among obese men and women compared with those of normal weight (IARC, 2002). In addition, two recent cohort studies confirmed a role for BMI (Bjorge ; van Dijk ). A potential mechanism by which obesity may increase kidney cancer risk involves increased levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) or lipid peroxidation. Increasing BMI is associated with elevated levels of fasting serum and free IGF-I among both men and women (Frystyk ). Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates cell proliferation and inhibits apoptosis, which could have a profound impact on tumour growth (Yu and Rohan, 2000). An association between hypertension and kidney cancer has also been previously reported (McLaughlin ). Hypertension is hypothesised to cause renal damage directly or cause metabolic or functional changes within the renal tubules, thus increasing the kidney's susceptibility to carcinogens or promoting agents (Cowley and Roman, 1996). The relationship between kidney cancer and hypertension is complex. McCredie and Stewart (1992) showed that kidney cancer in hypertensive patients was related to the duration of hypertension, suggesting that hypertension contributes is aetiologically relevant rather than being a consequence of the tumour (McCredie and Stewart, 1992). Also, in this connection, cohort studies may stratify by follow-up time, several finding that have found that the effect of hypertension is the same in the first years of follow-up as later (Fraser ; Coughlin ; Chow ). These findings support the hypothesis that hypertension is a risk factor for kidney cancer. Further, an increased risk has been reported with mild hypertension that would usually go untreated, and a decreasing risk of among those who have experienced lowered blood pressure levels over time (Chow ). Smoking is an established risk factor for kidney cancer, although the increase in risk is weak (IARC, 2004). In a comprehensive meta-analysis, we have recently estimated that the increased risk for ever smokers compared to never smokers was 38% (RR=1.38 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.49) (Hunt )). There was also a strong dose-dependent increase with increasing tobacco consumption. However, the OR for smoking obtained from the meta-analysis in hospital-based studies was 1.17 (95% CIs: 1.03, 1.34), whereas in population-based studies, it was 1.49 (95% CIs: 1.34, 1.66). Our current study had a 97% power of detecting an increased risk of 40% associated with smoking, although only about a 50% power of detecting a 20% increase in risk. One possible conclusion is that smokers were over-represented in hospital controls resulting in a reduced power to detect a real effect of smoking on kidney cancer. We did compare the smoking prevalence between the major control groups and did not detect any heterogeneity, although a small amount of bias could not be excluded. Our study confirms that BMI and a history of hypertension are risk factors for kidney cancer in central Europe, a region with the highest incidence currently reported, but these are unlikely to explain fully the high incidence, indicating that important causes remain to be discovered.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression.

Authors:  H Yu; T Rohan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Hypertension, antihypertensive medication and risk of renal carcinoma in California Seventh-Day Adventists.

Authors:  G E Fraser; R L Phillips; W L Beeson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Obesity, hypertension, and the risk of kidney cancer in men.

Authors:  W H Chow; G Gridley; J F Fraumeni; B Järvholm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Risk factors for kidney cancer in New South Wales, Australia. II. Urologic disease, hypertension, obesity, and hormonal factors.

Authors:  M McCredie; J H Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Renal cell carcinoma in relation to cigarette smoking: meta-analysis of 24 studies.

Authors:  Jay D Hunt; Olga L van der Hel; Garnett P McMillan; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Relation of height, body mass, energy intake, and physical activity to risk of renal cell carcinoma: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study.

Authors:  Boukje A C van Dijk; Leo J Schouten; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Piet A van den Brandt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Relation of height and body mass index to renal cell carcinoma in two million Norwegian men and women.

Authors:  Tone Bjørge; Steinar Tretli; Anders Engeland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Free insulin-like growth factors in human obesity.

Authors:  J Frystyk; E Vestbo; C Skjaerbaek; C E Mogensen; H Orskov
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 9.  Renal cell carcinoma: etiology, incidence and epidemiology.

Authors:  Masaru Murai; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Obesity and renal cell cancer--a quantitative review.

Authors:  A Bergström; C C Hsieh; P Lindblad; C M Lu; N R Cook; A Wolk
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  22 in total

1.  Renal cancer risk and occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and plastics.

Authors:  Sara Karami; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Patricia A Stewart; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matveev; Vladimir Janout; Helena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Jan P Gromiec; Roman Sobotka; Wong-Ho Chow; Nathaniel Rothman; Lee E Moore
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Pseudo semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation exploiting gene environment independence for population-based case-control studies with complex samples.

Authors:  Yan Li; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Cardiovascular, diabetes, and cancer strips: evidences, mechanisms, and classifications.

Authors:  Chun-Song Hu; Qing-Hua Wu; Da-Yi Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Occupational trichloroethylene exposure and renal carcinoma risk: evidence of genetic susceptibility by reductive metabolism gene variants.

Authors:  Lee E Moore; Paolo Boffetta; Sara Karami; Paul Brennan; Patricia S Stewart; Rayjean Hung; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matveev; Vladimir Janout; Helena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Jan Gromiec; Ivana Holcatova; Maria Merino; Stephen Chanock; Wong-Ho Chow; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  An investigation of risk factors for renal cell carcinoma by histologic subtype in two case-control studies.

Authors:  Mark P Purdue; Lee E Moore; Maria J Merino; Paolo Boffetta; Joanne S Colt; Kendra L Schwartz; Vladimir Bencko; Faith G Davis; Barry I Graubard; Vladimir Janout; Julie J Ruterbusch; Jennifer Beebe-Dimmer; Michele L Cote; Brian Shuch; Dana Mates; Jonathan N Hofmann; Lenka Foretova; Nathaniel Rothman; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Vsevolod Matveev; Sholom Wacholder; David Zaridze; W Marston Linehan; Paul Brennan; Wong-Ho Chow
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Body mass index and renal cell cancer: the influence of race and sex.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Joanne S Colt; Julie J Ruterbusch; Gregory R Keele; Mark P Purdue; Sholom Wacholder; Barry I Graubard; Faith Davis; Wong-Ho Chow; Kendra L Schwartz
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Variants in blood pressure genes and the risk of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gabriella Andreotti; Paolo Boffetta; Philip S Rosenberg; Sonja I Berndt; Sara Karami; Idan Menashe; Meredith Yeager; Stephen J Chanock; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matteev; Vladimir Janout; Hellena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Nathaniel Rothman; Paul Brennan; Wong-Ho Chow; Lee E Moore
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Apolipoprotein E/C1 locus variants modify renal cell carcinoma risk.

Authors:  Lee E Moore; Paul Brennan; Sara Karami; Idan Menashe; Sonja I Berndt; Linda M Dong; Allison Meisner; Meredith Yeager; Stephen Chanock; Joanne Colt; Kendra Schwartz; Faith Davis; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Mattveev; Vladimir Janout; Hellena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Ivana Holcatova; Paolo Boffetta; Wong-Ho Chow; Philip S Rosenberg; Nathaniel Rothman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data.

Authors:  Arjun Bhattacharya; Alina M Hamilton; Helena Furberg; Eugene Pietzak; Mark P Purdue; Melissa A Troester; Katherine A Hoadley; Michael I Love
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Poor-Prognosis Metastatic Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults: Incidence Patterns, Trends, and Disparities.

Authors:  Jessica Sheth Bhutada; Amie Hwang; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; David R Freyer
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.