Chun-Song Hu1, Qing-Hua Wu1, Da-Yi Hu1. 1. 1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China ; 2 Cardiovascular Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To report and name firstly that there are cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancers (CDC) strips; and disclose their mechanisms, classifications, and clinical significances. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative and systematic review study and interpretive analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: to collect and present related evidences on CDC strips from evidence-based, open-access, both Chinese- and English-language literatures in recent 10 years on clinical trials from PubMed according to keywords "CVD, DM and cancers" as well as authors' extensive clinical experience with the treatment of more than fifty thousands of patients with CVD, diabetes and cancers over the past decades, and analyze their related mechanisms and categories which based on authors' previous works. DATA EXTRACTION: data were mainly extracted from 48 articles which are listed in the reference section of this review. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed data were included, narratively and systematically reviewed. RESULTS: With several conceptual and technical breakthrough, authors present related evidences on CDC strips, these are, CVD and DM, DM and cancers, cancers and CVD linked, respectively; And "Bad SEED" +/- "bad soil" theory or doctrine may explain this phenomenon due to "internal environmental injure, abnormal or unbalance" in human body resulting from the role of risk factors (RFs) related multi-pathways and multi-targets, which including organ & tissue (e.g., vascular-specific), cell and gene-based mechanisms. Their classifications include main strips/type B, and Branches/type A as showed by tables and figures in this article. CONCLUSIONS: There are CDC strips and related mechanisms and classifications. CDC strips may help us to understand, prevent, and control related common non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as well as these high risk strips.
OBJECTIVES: To report and name firstly that there are cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancers (CDC) strips; and disclose their mechanisms, classifications, and clinical significances. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative and systematic review study and interpretive analysis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: to collect and present related evidences on CDC strips from evidence-based, open-access, both Chinese- and English-language literatures in recent 10 years on clinical trials from PubMed according to keywords "CVD, DM and cancers" as well as authors' extensive clinical experience with the treatment of more than fifty thousands of patients with CVD, diabetes and cancers over the past decades, and analyze their related mechanisms and categories which based on authors' previous works. DATA EXTRACTION: data were mainly extracted from 48 articles which are listed in the reference section of this review. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed data were included, narratively and systematically reviewed. RESULTS: With several conceptual and technical breakthrough, authors present related evidences on CDC strips, these are, CVD and DM, DM and cancers, cancers and CVD linked, respectively; And "Bad SEED" +/- "bad soil" theory or doctrine may explain this phenomenon due to "internal environmental injure, abnormal or unbalance" in human body resulting from the role of risk factors (RFs) related multi-pathways and multi-targets, which including organ & tissue (e.g., vascular-specific), cell and gene-based mechanisms. Their classifications include main strips/type B, and Branches/type A as showed by tables and figures in this article. CONCLUSIONS: There are CDC strips and related mechanisms and classifications. CDC strips may help us to understand, prevent, and control related common non-communicable diseases (NCDs) as well as these high risk strips.
Authors: Sheng Shou Hu; Ling Zhi Kong; Run Lin Gao; Man Lu Zhu; Wen Wang; Yong Jun Wang; Zhao Su Wu; Wei Wei Chen; Ming Bo Liu Journal: Biomed Environ Sci Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Steven E Lipshultz; Nader Rifai; Virginia M Dalton; Donna E Levy; Lewis B Silverman; Stuart R Lipsitz; Steven D Colan; Barbara L Asselin; Ronald D Barr; Luis A Clavell; Craig A Hurwitz; Albert Moghrabi; Yvan Samson; Marshall A Schorin; Richard D Gelber; Stephen E Sallan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Beverley Balkau; John E Deanfield; Jean-Pierre Després; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Keith A A Fox; Sidney C Smith; Philip Barter; Chee-Eng Tan; Luc Van Gaal; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Christine Massien; Steven M Haffner Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Gabriella Andreotti; Paolo Boffetta; Philip S Rosenberg; Sonja I Berndt; Sara Karami; Idan Menashe; Meredith Yeager; Stephen J Chanock; David Zaridze; Vsevolod Matteev; Vladimir Janout; Hellena Kollarova; Vladimir Bencko; Marie Navratilova; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Dana Mates; Nathaniel Rothman; Paul Brennan; Wong-Ho Chow; Lee E Moore Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Arnout G Schepers; Hugo J Snippert; Daniel E Stange; Maaike van den Born; Johan H van Es; Marc van de Wetering; Hans Clevers Journal: Science Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Flávio Augusto Teixeira Ronzani; Filomena Maria Kirchmaier; Nathália Mussi Monteze; Edson José de Carvalho Magacho; Marcus Gomes Bastos; Natália Maria da Silva Fernandes Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2017 Mar-Apr