Literature DB >> 19033258

Inferring the strength of selection in Drosophila under complex demographic models.

Josefa González1, J Michael Macpherson, Philipp W Messer, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) constitute a substantial fraction of the genomes of many species, and it is thus important to understand their population dynamics. The strength of natural selection against TEs is a key parameter in understanding these dynamics. In principle, the strength of selection can be inferred from the frequencies of a sample of TEs. However, complicated demographic histories, such as found in Drosophila melanogaster, could lead to a substantial distortion of the TE frequency distribution compared with that expected for a panmictic, constant-sized population. The current methodology for the estimation of selection intensity acting against TEs does not take into account demographic history and might generate erroneous estimates especially for TE families under weak selection. Here, we develop a flexible maximum likelihood methodology that explicitly accounts both for demographic history and for the ascertainment biases of identifying TEs. We apply this method to the newly generated frequency data of the BS family of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons in D. melanogaster in concert with two recent models of the demographic history of the species to infer the intensity of selection against this family. We find the estimate to differ substantially compared with a prior estimate that was made assuming a model of constant population size. Further, we find there to be relatively little information about selection intensity present in the derived non-African frequency data and that the ancestral African subpopulation is much more informative in this respect. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for demographic history and bear on study design for the inference of selection coefficients generally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19033258      PMCID: PMC2767090          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  38 in total

1.  The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Rasmus Nielsen; Stanley A Sawyer; Kenneth M Olsen; Michael D Purugganan; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sure facts, speculations, and open questions about the evolution of transposable element copy number.

Authors:  S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  James D Fry; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Demography and natural selection have shaped genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a multi-locus approach.

Authors:  Sascha Glinka; Lino Ometto; Sylvain Mousset; Wolfgang Stephan; David De Lorenzo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution.

Authors:  Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Detecting local adaptation using the joint sampling of polymorphism data in the parental and derived populations.

Authors:  Hideki Innan; Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Size matters: non-LTR retrotransposable elements and ectopic recombination in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov; Yael T Aminetzach; Jerel C Davis; Douda Bensasson; Aaron E Hirsh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Coevolution of the telomeric retrotransposons across Drosophila species.

Authors:  Elena Casacuberta; Mary-Lou Pardue
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Evolution of genome size in Drosophila. is the invader's genome being invaded by transposable elements?

Authors:  Cristina Vieira; Christiane Nardon; Christophe Arpin; David Lepetit; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective.

Authors:  Joshua S Kaminker; Casey M Bergman; Brent Kronmiller; Joseph Carlson; Robert Svirskas; Sandeep Patel; Erwin Frise; David A Wheeler; Suzanna E Lewis; Gerald M Rubin; Michael Ashburner; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  12 in total

1.  Measuring the rates of spontaneous mutation from deep and large-scale polymorphism data.

Authors:  Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Vertical inheritance and bursts of transposition have shaped the evolution of the BS non-LTR retrotransposon in Drosophila.

Authors:  Adriana Granzotto; Fabrício R Lopes; Cristina Vieira; Claudia M A Carareto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Genome-wide patterns of adaptation to temperate environments associated with transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Talia L Karasov; Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Population dynamics of PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) and their targets in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements during silkworm domestication.

Authors:  Min-Jin Han; Hong-En Xu; Xiao-Min Xiong; Hua-Hao Zhang
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 1.839

Review 6.  The adaptive role of transposable elements in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josefa González; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  An age-of-allele test of neutrality for transposable element insertions.

Authors:  Justin P Blumenstiel; Xi Chen; Miaomiao He; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A transposable element insertion confers xenobiotic resistance in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lidia Mateo; Anna Ullastres; Josefa González
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Deep Learning for Population Genetic Inference.

Authors:  Sara Sheehan; Yun S Song
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Lack of population differentiation patterns of previously identified putatively adaptive transposable element insertions at microgeographic scales.

Authors:  Josefa González; Jose Martínez; Wojciech Makalowski
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.