Literature DB >> 19033242

Decision ecology: foraging and the ecology of animal decision making.

David W Stephens1.   

Abstract

In this article, I review the approach taken by behavioral ecologists to the study of animal foraging behavior and explore connections with general analyses of decision making. I use the example of patch exploitation decisions in this article in order to develop several key points about the properties of naturally occurring foraging decisions. First, I argue that experimental preparations based on binary, mutually exclusive choice are not good models of foraging decisions. Instead, foraging choices have a sequential foreground-background structure, in which one option is in the background of all other options. Second, behavioral ecologists view foraging as a hierarchy of decisions that range from habitat selection to food choice. Finally, data suggest that foraging animals are sensitive to several important trade-offs. These trade-offs include the effects of competitors and group mates, as well as the problem of predator avoidance.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19033242     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  18 in total

Review 1.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Neural correlates of decisions.

Authors:  Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Neural systems involved in fear and anxiety measured with fear-potentiated startle.

Authors:  Michael Davis
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2006-11

Review 4.  Neuroecology.

Authors:  David F Sherry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Predrag Petrovic; Jennifer L Marchant; Demis Hassabis; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others.

Authors:  Jonathan I Flombaum; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice.

Authors:  Cynthia Schuck-Paim; Lorena Pompilio; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  52 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary perspectives on decision making.

Authors:  Tobias Kalenscher; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of daylong cognitive work on economic decisions.

Authors:  Bastien Blain; Guillaume Hollard; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Octopamine mediates starvation-induced hyperactivity in adult Drosophila.

Authors:  Zhe Yang; Yue Yu; Vivian Zhang; Yinjun Tian; Wei Qi; Liming Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Systems Neuroscience of Natural Behaviors in Rodents.

Authors:  Emily Jane Dennis; Ahmed El Hady; Angie Michaiel; Ann Clemens; Dougal R Gowan Tervo; Jakob Voigts; Sandeep Robert Datta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Subjective costs drive overly patient foraging strategies in rats on an intertemporal foraging task.

Authors:  Andrew M Wikenheiser; David W Stephens; A David Redish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Variance-sensitive choice in lemurs: constancy trumps quantity.

Authors:  Evan L MacLean; Tara M Mandalaywala; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Neural signatures underlying deliberation in human foraging decisions.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Michael Hanke; A David Redish; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Motor cost affects the decision of when to shift gaze for guiding movement.

Authors:  F Javier Domínguez-Zamora; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Do humans make good decisions?

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Competition for light induces metal accumulation in a metal hyperaccumulating plant.

Authors:  Anubhav Mohiley; Katja Tielbörger; Michael Weber; Stephan Clemens; Michal Gruntman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.