OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated event-related brain potential (ERP) indices of auditory processing and sensory gating in bipolar disorder and subgroups of bipolar patients with or without a history of psychosis using the P50 dual-click procedure. Auditory-evoked activity in two discrete frequency bands also was explored to distinguish between sensory registration and selective attention deficits. METHODS: Thirty-one individuals with bipolar disorder and 28 non-psychiatric controls were compared on ERP indices of auditory processing using a dual-click procedure. In addition to conventional P50 ERP peak-picking techniques, quantitative frequency analyses were applied to the ERP data to isolate stages of information processing associated with sensory registration (20-50 Hz; gamma band) and selective attention (0-20 Hz; low-frequency band). RESULTS: Compared to the non-psychiatric control group, patients with bipolar disorder exhibited reduced S1 response magnitudes for the conventional P50 peak-picking and low-frequency response analyses. A bipolar subgroup effect suggested that the attenuated S1 magnitudes from the P50 peak-picking and low-frequency analyses were largely attributable to patients without a history of psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of distinct frequency bands of the auditory-evoked response elicited during the dual-click procedure allowed further specification of the nature of auditory sensory processing and gating deficits in bipolar disorder with or without a history of psychosis. The observed S1 effects in the low-frequency band suggest selective attention deficits in bipolar patients, especially those patients without a history of psychosis, which may reflect a diminished capacity to selectively attend to salient stimuli as opposed to impairments of inhibitory sensory processes.
OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated event-related brain potential (ERP) indices of auditory processing and sensory gating in bipolar disorder and subgroups of bipolarpatients with or without a history of psychosis using the P50 dual-click procedure. Auditory-evoked activity in two discrete frequency bands also was explored to distinguish between sensory registration and selective attention deficits. METHODS: Thirty-one individuals with bipolar disorder and 28 non-psychiatric controls were compared on ERP indices of auditory processing using a dual-click procedure. In addition to conventional P50 ERP peak-picking techniques, quantitative frequency analyses were applied to the ERP data to isolate stages of information processing associated with sensory registration (20-50 Hz; gamma band) and selective attention (0-20 Hz; low-frequency band). RESULTS: Compared to the non-psychiatric control group, patients with bipolar disorder exhibited reduced S1 response magnitudes for the conventional P50 peak-picking and low-frequency response analyses. A bipolar subgroup effect suggested that the attenuated S1 magnitudes from the P50 peak-picking and low-frequency analyses were largely attributable to patients without a history of psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of distinct frequency bands of the auditory-evoked response elicited during the dual-click procedure allowed further specification of the nature of auditory sensory processing and gating deficits in bipolar disorder with or without a history of psychosis. The observed S1 effects in the low-frequency band suggest selective attention deficits in bipolarpatients, especially those patients without a history of psychosis, which may reflect a diminished capacity to selectively attend to salient stimuli as opposed to impairments of inhibitory sensory processes.
Authors: Olga Rass; Giri Krishnan; Colleen A Brenner; William P Hetrick; Colleen C Merrill; Anantha Shekhar; Brian F O'Donnell Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Matthew E Hudgens-Haney; Lauren E Ethridge; Jennifer E McDowell; Sarah K Keedy; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Brett A Clementz Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Anastasia M Bobilev; Lauren K Hayrynen; Matthew E Hudgens-Haney; William T Oliver; David A Parker; Jennifer E McDowell; Peter A Buckley; Brett A Clementz Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; John R Shapiro; Michael C Stevens; Nashaat N Boutros; Ann T Summerfelt; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Godfrey Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Gunvant Thaker; Brett A Clementz Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Jason K Johannesen; Brian F O'Donnell; Anantha Shekhar; John H McGrew; William P Hetrick Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; Nashaat N Boutros; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Brett A Clementz Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Jordan P Hamm; Lauren E Ethridge; John R Shapiro; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant K Thaker; Brett A Clementz Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Lauren E Ethridge; Jordan P Hamm; John R Shapiro; Ann T Summerfelt; Sarah K Keedy; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Nash N Boutros; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant Thaker; Brett A Clementz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Ion N Beratis; Andreas Rabavilas; Eleni D Nanou; Chrissanthi Hountala; Argiro E Maganioti; Christos N Capsalis; George N Papadimitriou; Charalabos Papageorgiou Journal: Behav Brain Funct Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 3.759