Literature DB >> 19029419

What are terminally ill cancer patients told about their expected deaths? A study of cancer physicians' self-reports of prognosis disclosure.

Christopher K Daugherty1, Fay J Hlubocky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little is known about how physicians discuss prognosis with terminally ill cancer patients. Thus, we sought to obtain cancer physicians' self-reports of their prognosis communication practices.
METHODS: A survey seeking self-reports regarding prognosis communication with their terminally ill cancer patients was mailed to a systematic sample of medical oncologists in the United States.
RESULTS: Of 1,137 physicians, 729 completed and returned surveys (64% response rate). Median age of respondents was 51 years (range, 33 to 80 years); 82% were men. Respondents had practiced cancer care for a median of 18 years (range, 1.5 to 50 years) and reported seeing a median of 60 patients per week (range, 0 to 250 patients per week). Although 98% said their usual practice is to tell terminally ill patients that they will die, 48% specifically described communicating terminal prognoses to patients only when specific preferences for prognosis information were expressed. Forty-three percent said they always or usually communicate a medical estimate of time as to when death is likely to occur, and 57% reported sometimes, rarely, or never giving a time frame. Seventy-three percent said prognosis communication education was either absent or inadequate during their training, and 96% believed it should be part of cancer care training.
CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists report routinely informing their terminally ill patients that they will die. However, they are divided in describing themselves as either always discussing a terminal prognosis or doing so if it is consistent with their patients' preferences for prognostic information. Most medical oncologists say they do not routinely communicate an estimated survival time to their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19029419      PMCID: PMC2645114          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.2221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

2.  Shading the truth in seeking informed consent for research purposes.

Authors:  S Bok
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1995-03

3.  Survival of Medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs.

Authors:  N A Christakis; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Accuracy of prediction of survival by different professional groups in a hospice.

Authors:  D Oxenham; M A Cornbleet
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Oncology and hope.

Authors:  E Kodish; S G Post
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Abandoning informed consent.

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Informed consent, cancer, and truth in prognosis.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; P B Terry; C S Weisman; D J Miller; R Y Stallings; M A Vettese; K B Haller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.

Authors:  C Daugherty; M J Ratain; E Grochowski; C Stocking; E Kodish; R Mick; M Siegler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients.

Authors:  N T Miyaji
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  45 in total

1.  Taboo Topics in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: Strategies for Managing Challenging but Important Conversations Central to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Giselle K Perez; John M Salsman; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Elyse R Park; Abby R Rosenberg
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2020-03

2.  Is there a right not to know?

Authors:  Devan Stahl; Tom Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Defining the Scope of Prognosis: Primary Care Clinicians' Perspectives on Predicting the Future Health of Older Adults.

Authors:  John M Thomas; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosure in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Angel M Cronin; Tammy I Kang; Jennifer W Mack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Characterizing the Nature of Scan Results Discussions: Insights Into Why Patients Misunderstand Their Prognosis.

Authors:  Sarguni Singh; Dagoberto Cortez; Douglas Maynard; James F Cleary; Lori DuBenske; Toby C Campbell
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Outcomes of Prognostic Disclosure: Associations With Prognostic Understanding, Distress, and Relationship With Physician Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Deborah Schrag; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Ethical Challenges in Pediatric Oncology Care and Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Benedetti; Jonathan M Marron
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2021

8.  Physicians' perceptions of the value of prognostic models: the benefits and risks of prognostic confidence.

Authors:  Sarah A M Hallen; Norbert A M Hootsmans; Laura Blaisdell; Caitlin M Gutheil; Paul K J Han
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  General internists' preferences and knowledge about the care of adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Eugene Suh; Christopher K Daugherty; Kristen Wroblewski; Hannah Lee; Mackenzie L Kigin; Kenneth A Rasinski; Jennifer S Ford; Emily S Tonorezos; Paul C Nathan; Kevin C Oeffinger; Tara O Henderson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Family physician preferences and knowledge gaps regarding the care of adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Paul Craig Nathan; Christopher Keller Daugherty; Kristen Elizabeth Wroblewski; Mackenzie Louise Kigin; Tom Vernon Stewart; Fay Jarmila Hlubocky; Eva Grunfeld; Marie Elisabeth Del Giudice; Leigh-Anne Evelyn Ward; James Mahlon Galliher; Kevin Charles Oeffinger; Tara Olive Henderson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.