Literature DB >> 19029007

Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice.

M A Vasquez1, C E Munschauer.   

Abstract

The time is ripe for universal understanding and acceptance of outcome assessment in venous disease. Outcome studies promote understanding of the diseases we treat and the results of treatment. The choice of a valid and reliable assessment tool is crucial. Patient-generated quality-of-life tools include generic instruments and disease-specific instruments. Generic instruments evaluate overall well-being and provide subjective measurements of treatment outcomes in various disease states. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the Nottingham Health Profile are widely used generic surveys. Disease-specific instruments relate to a particular disease state. They are popular in venous disease reporting and have high sensitivity. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire, the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire and the Charing Cross Venous Ulceration Questionnaire are such devices. Physician-generated measurement tools are used to evaluate and classify the consequences of venous disease. The clinical, aetiology, anatomy, pathophysiology classification (CEAP) is a popular descriptive platform for chronic venous disease. The Venous Severity Scoring (VSS) system was derived from the CEAP classification to provide evaluative capabilities. The three elements of the VSS are the venous disability score, the venous segmental disease score and the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). The VCSS facilitates the follow-up of features of venous disease that change with treatment. Each of these outcomes tools has been validated, and each has strengths and weaknesses. Maintaining the dynamic nature of assessment with periodic review and revision is the way forward to generating universal applicability. Although the choice of instrument is debatable, the most important factor in improving treatment outcomes is the decision to examine results and to share them in a meaningful way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19029007     DOI: 10.1258/phleb.2008.008018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phlebology        ISSN: 0268-3555            Impact factor:   1.740


  16 in total

1.  Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux.

Authors:  Misaki M Kiguchi; Eric S Hager; Daniel G Winger; Stanley A Hirsch; Rabih A Chaer; Ellen D Dillavou
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  The management of varicose veins.

Authors:  Fan Lin; Shiyi Zhang; Yan Sun; Shiyan Ren; Peng Liu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

3.  Classification of reflux patterns in patients with great saphenous vein insufficiency and correlation with clinical severity.

Authors:  Sezen Yılmaz; Burçak Çakır Peköz; Neris Dincer; Sinan Deniz; Levent Oğuzkurt
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Perioperative quality assessment of varicose vein surgery : Commission for quality assessment of the German Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  T Noppeney; M Storck; H Nüllen; C-G Schmedt; R Kellersmann; D Böckler; K Walluscheck; G Torsello; S Debus
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Construction and international validation of CIVIQ-14 (a short form of CIVIQ-20), a new questionnaire with a stable factorial structure.

Authors:  R Launois; J G Le Moine; F S Lozano; A Mansilha
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The VVSymQ® instrument: Use of a new patient-reported outcome measure for assessment of varicose vein symptoms.

Authors:  Jean Paty; Diane M Turner-Bowker; Celeste A Elash; David Wright
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 1.740

7.  The calendar of cytokines: Seasonal variation of circulating cytokines in chronic venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Paolo Spath; Veronica Tisato; Sergio Gianesini; Mirko Tessari; Erica Menegatti; Roberto Manfredini; Savino Occhionorelli; Paola Secchiero; Paolo Zamboni
Journal:  JRSM Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-09-08

8.  Efficacy of Cyanoacrylate Glue Ablation of Primary Truncal Varicose Veins Compared to Existing Endovenous Techniques: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anthony Pio Dimech; Kevin Cassar
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Modulation of circulating cytokine-chemokine profile in patients affected by chronic venous insufficiency undergoing surgical hemodynamic correction.

Authors:  Veronica Tisato; Giorgio Zauli; Sergio Gianesini; Erica Menegatti; Laura Brunelli; Roberto Manfredini; Paolo Zamboni; Paola Secchiero
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.818

10.  Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20).

Authors:  Özlem Cinar Özdemir; Eda Tonga; Agah Tekindal; Yesim Bakar
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.