Literature DB >> 19023190

Ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening: a workshop report.

B K Potter1, D Avard, V Entwistle, C Kennedy, P Chakraborty, M McGuire, B J Wilson.   

Abstract

Prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening programs have been a focus of recent policy debates that have included attention to ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSIs). In parallel, there has been an ongoing discussion about whether and how ELSIs may be addressed in health technology assessment (HTA). We conducted a knowledge synthesis study to explore both guidance and current practice regarding the consideration of ELSIs in HTA for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening. As the concluding activity for this project, we held a Canadian workshop to discuss the issues with a diverse group of stakeholders. Based on key workshop themes integrated with our study results, we suggest that population-based genetic screening programs may present particular types of ELSIs and that a public health ethics perspective is potentially highly relevant when considering them. We also suggest that approaches to addressing ELSIs in HTA for prenatal/preconceptional and newborn screening may need to be flexible enough to respond to diversity in HTA organizations, cultural values, stakeholder communities, and contextual factors. Finally, we highlight a need for transparency in the way that HTA producers move from evidence to conclusions and the ways in which screening policy decisions are made.
Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19023190      PMCID: PMC2790790          DOI: 10.1159/000153430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  49 in total

1.  The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing. Reflections and Recommendations.

Authors:  E Parens; A Asch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  An ethics framework for public health.

Authors:  N E Kass
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Is nondirectiveness possible within the context of antenatal screening and testing?

Authors:  Clare Williams; Priscilla Alderson; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Principles for the justification of public health intervention.

Authors:  R E G Upshur
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

5.  Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations.

Authors:  Erik Parens; Adrienne Asch
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2003

6.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Public health ethics: mapping the terrain.

Authors:  James F Childress; Ruth R Faden; Ruth D Gaare; Lawrence O Gostin; Jeffrey Kahn; Richard J Bonnie; Nancy E Kass; Anna C Mastroianni; Jonathan D Moreno; Phillip Nieburg
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  The routinization of prenatal testing.

Authors:  Sonia Mateu Suter
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2002

9.  Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies.

Authors:  P Lehoux; S Blume
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.265

10.  Exploring informed choice in the context of prenatal testing: findings from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Beth K Potter; Natasha O'Reilly; Holly Etchegary; Heather Howley; Ian D Graham; Mark Walker; Doug Coyle; Yelena Chorny; Mario Cappelli; Isabelle Boland; Brenda J Wilson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  4 in total

1.  Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; B J Wilson; S M Craigie; H Etchegary; D Castle; J C Carroll; B K Potter; L Lemyre; J Little
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.166

2.  Personalized medicine and access to health care: potential for inequitable access?

Authors:  Kelly A McClellan; Denise Avard; Jacques Simard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Association between use of systematic reviews and national policy recommendations on screening newborn babies for rare diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sian Taylor-Phillips; Chris Stinton; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Farah Seedat; Aileen Clarke; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-05-09

4.  Simple Test, Complex System: Multifaceted Views of Newborn Screening Science, Technology, and Policy.

Authors:  Kee Chan; Michael Petros
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2019-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.