Literature DB >> 19019977

Inhibition of voluntary saccadic eye movement commands by abrupt visual onsets.

Jay A Edelman1, Kitty Z Xu.   

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements are made both to explore the visual world and to react to sudden sensory events. We studied the ability for humans to execute a voluntary (i.e., nonstimulus-driven) saccade command in the face of a suddenly appearing visual stimulus. Subjects were required to make a saccade to a memorized location when a central fixation point disappeared. At varying times relative to fixation point disappearance a visual distractor appeared at a random location. When the distractor appeared at locations distant from the target virtually no saccades were initiated in a 30- to 40-ms interval beginning 70-80 ms after appearance of the distractor. If the distractor was presented slightly earlier relative to saccade initiation then saccades tended to have smaller amplitudes, with velocity profiles suggesting that the distractor terminated them prematurely. In contrast, distractors appearing close to the saccade target elicited express saccade-like movements 70-100 ms after their appearance, although the saccade endpoint was generally scarcely affected by the distractor. An additional experiment showed that these effects were weaker when the saccade was made to a visible target in a delayed task and still weaker when the saccade itself was made in response to the abrupt appearance of a visual stimulus. A final experiment revealed that the effect is smaller, but quite evident, for very small stimuli. These results suggest that the transient component of a visual response can briefly but almost completely suppress a voluntary saccade command, but only when the stimulus evoking that response is distant from the saccade goal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19019977      PMCID: PMC2666419          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90708.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

1.  The omnipresent prolongation of visual fixations: saccades are inhibited by changes in situation and in subject's activity.

Authors:  S Pannasch; S M Dornhoefer; P J Unema; B M Velichkovsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus during a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The influence of object-relative visuomotor set on express saccades.

Authors:  Jay A Edelman; Arni Kristjánsson; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks.

Authors:  J Goldring; B Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone.

Authors:  R Walker; H Deubel; W X Schneider; J M Findlay
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: I. Subcortical pathways and topography of striatal and thalamic terminal fields.

Authors:  G B Stanton; M E Goldberg; C J Bruce
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-05-22       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The influence of auditory and visual distractors on human orienting gaze shifts.

Authors:  B D Corneil; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The effect of frontal eye field and superior colliculus lesions on saccadic latencies in the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J H Sandell; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search.

Authors:  J D Schall; D P Hanes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  22 in total

1.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

2.  Disrupting saccadic updating: visual interference prior to the first saccade elicits spatial errors in the secondary saccade in a double-step task.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; David Melcher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Alteration of the microsaccadic velocity-amplitude main sequence relationship after visual transients: implications for models of saccade control.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Chih-Yang Chen; Xiaoguang Tian; Saad Idrees; Thomas A Münch; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Eye Position Error Influence over "Open-Loop" Smooth Pursuit Initiation.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Julianne Skinner; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Quick phases of infantile nystagmus show the saccadic inhibition effect.

Authors:  James J Harrison; Petroc Sumner; Matt J Dunn; Jonathan T Erichsen; Tom C A Freeman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Attentional cueing at the saccade goal, not at the target location, facilitates saccades.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Stephen J Heinen; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Under time pressure, the exogenous modulation of saccade plans is ubiquitous, intricate, and lawful.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Learning and memory performance in breast cancer survivors 2 to 6 years post-treatment: the role of encoding versus forgetting.

Authors:  James C Root; Charissa Andreotti; Loretta Tsu; Timothy M Ellmore; Tim A Ahles
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Time-dependent inhibition of covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Niklas Dietze; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.