Literature DB >> 34216231

Time-dependent inhibition of covert shifts of attention.

Antimo Buonocore1,2, Niklas Dietze3,4,5, Robert D McIntosh3.   

Abstract

Visual transients can interrupt overt orienting by abolishing the execution of a planned eye movement due about 90 ms later, a phenomenon known as saccadic inhibition (SI). It is not known if the same inhibitory process might influence covert orienting in the absence of saccades, and consequently alter visual perception. In Experiment 1 (n = 14), we measured orientation discrimination during a covert orienting task in which an uninformative exogenous visual cue preceded the onset of an oriented probe by 140-290 ms. In half of the trials, the onset of the probe was accompanied by a brief irrelevant flash, a visual transient that would normally induce SI. We report a time-dependent inhibition of covert orienting in which the irrelevant flash impaired orientation discrimination accuracy when the probe followed the cue by 190 and 240 ms. The interference was more pronounced when the cue was incongruent with the probe location, suggesting an impact on the reorienting component of the attentional shift. In Experiment 2 (n = 12), we tested whether the inhibitory effect of the flash could occur within an earlier time range, or only within the later, reorienting range. We presented probes at congruent cue locations in a time window between 50 and 200 ms. Similar to Experiment 1, discrimination performance was altered at 200 ms after the cue. We suggest that covert attention may be susceptible to similar inhibitory mechanisms that generate SI, especially in later stages of attentional shifting (> 200 ms after a cue), typically associated with reorienting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covert orienting; Saccadic inhibition; Visual interference

Year:  2021        PMID: 34216231     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06164-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  64 in total

Review 1.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: a comparison, review, and update.

Authors:  B G Breitmeyer; H Ogmen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-11

2.  Updating the premotor theory: the allocation of attention is not always accompanied by saccade preparation.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Beyond the point of no return: effects of visual distractors on saccade amplitude and velocity.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Robert D McIntosh; David Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Saccadic inhibition reveals the timing of automatic and voluntary signals in the human brain.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Modulation of saccadic inhibition by distractor size and location.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli.

Authors:  W Becker; R Jürgens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous attention on second-order texture contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Michael S Landy; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Interference during eye movement preparation shifts the timing of perisaccadic compression.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; David Melcher
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.