Literature DB >> 19019200

Visual mismatch negativity for changes in orientation--a sensory memory-dependent response.

Piia Astikainen1, Elina Lillstrang, Timo Ruusuvirta.   

Abstract

It remains unclear whether the mismatch negativity of event-related potentials (ERPs) in vision resembles its auditory counterpart in terms of memory relatedness. We recorded ERPs to visual bars in adult humans engaged in an auditory task. In one condition, a bar ('standard') repeated at 400- or 1100-ms non-stimulated intervals was rarely (P = 0.1) replaced by another bar of a different orientation ('deviant'). In the other condition (400-ms intervals), the occurrences of the standards were replaced by 10 (P = 0.1 each) bars of different orientations, including that of the deviant ('control-deviant'). Deviants shifted ERPs towards negative polarity relative to standards in occipital electrodes and towards positive polarity in frontal electrodes at 185-205 ms post-stimulus but only when 400-ms non-stimulated intervals were applied. Furthermore, the shift existed even relative to ERPs to control-deviants. The findings suggest that, as in audition, vision supports the detection of voluntarily unattended changes per se within the constraints of sensory memory. The findings also pave the way for the future exploration of both intact and impaired memory-based visual processing and memory capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19019200     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  29 in total

1.  Mismatch negativity with visual-only and audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Curtis W Ponton; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Stewart Boyd; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Involvement of the visual change detection process in facilitating perceptual alternation in the bistable image.

Authors:  Tomokazu Urakawa; Mao Bunya; Osamu Araki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Event-related potentials reveal rapid registration of features of infrequent changes during change blindness.

Authors:  Pessi Lyyra; Jan Wikgren; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  Rapid extraction of lexical tone phonology in Chinese characters: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Xiao-Dong Wang; A-Ping Liu; Yin-Yuan Wu; Peng Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  fMRI investigation of visual change detection in adults with autism.

Authors:  H Clery; F Andersson; F Bonnet-Brilhault; A Philippe; B Wicker; M Gomot
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Event-related potentials to task-irrelevant changes in facial expressions.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Electrophysiological evidence of atypical visual change detection in adults with autism.

Authors:  H Cléry; S Roux; E Houy-Durand; F Bonnet-Brilhault; N Bruneau; M Gomot
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Can eye of origin serve as a deviant? Visual mismatch negativity from binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Manja van Rhijn; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Unattended and attended visual change detection of motion as indexed by event-related potentials and its behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Nele Kuldkepp; Kairi Kreegipuu; Aire Raidvee; Risto Näätänen; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.