Literature DB >> 19551375

Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?

Maria Flynn1, Alki Liasis, Mark Gardner, Stewart Boyd, Tony Towell.   

Abstract

A passive three stimulus oddball paradigm was used to investigate Visual Mismatch Negativity (vMMN) a component of the Event Related Potential (ERP) believed to represent a central pre-attentive change mechanism. Responses to a change in orientation were recorded to monochrome stimuli presented to subjects on a computer screen. One of the infrequent stimuli formed an illusory figure (Kanizsa Square) aimed to capture spatial attention in the absence of an active task. Nineteen electrodes (10-20 system) were used to record the electroencephalogram in fourteen subjects (ten females) mean age 34.5 years. ERPs to all stimuli consisted of a positive negative positive complex recorded maximally over lateral occipital areas. The negative component was greater for deviant and illusory deviant compared to standard stimuli in a time window of 170-190 ms. A P3a component over frontal/central electrodes to the illusory deviant but not to the deviant stimulus suggests the illusory figure was able to capture attention and orientate subjects to the recording. Subtraction waveforms revealed visual discrimination responses at occipital electrodes, which may represent vMMN. In a control study with 13 subjects (11 females; mean age 29.23 years), using an embedded active attention task, we confirmed the existence of an earlier (150-170 ms) and attenuated vMMN. Recordings from an intracranial case study confirmed separation of N1 and discrimination components to posterior and anterior occipital areas, respectively. We conclude that although the illusory figure captured spatial attention in its own right it did not draw sufficient attentional resources from the standard-deviant comparison as revealed when using a concurrent active task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19551375     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1901-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes.

Authors:  István Czigler; László Balázs; István Winkler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality.

Authors:  Shimin Fu; Silu Fan; Lin Chen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 3.  Event-related potentials--the P3 wave.

Authors:  Tomas Hruby; Petr Marsalek
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.579

Review 4.  MMN in the visual modality: a review.

Authors:  P Pazo-Alvarez; F Cadaveira; E Amenedo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 5.  Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Thomas Jacobsen; István Winkler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.

Authors:  Galen F Hagen; James R Gatherwright; Brian A Lopez; John Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Magnetoencephalographic gamma-band responses to illusory triangles in humans.

Authors:  Jochen Kaiser; Mira Bühler; Werner Lutzenberger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  The human brain processes visual changes that are not cued by attended auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Piia Astikainen; Timo Ruusuvirta; Jan Wikgren; Tapani Korhonen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination.

Authors:  N Kraus; T McGee; T D Carrell; A Sharma
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  Gábor Stefanics; Jan Kremláček; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates.

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Combining Behavioral and ERP Methodologies to Investigate the Differences Between McGurk Effects Demonstrated by Cantonese and Mandarin Speakers.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Yaxuan Meng; Catherine McBride; Xitao Fan; Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Oblique effect in visual mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Endre Takács; István Sulykos; István Czigler; Irén Barkaszi; László Balázs
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.