OBJECTIVE: We evaluate psychometric properties of a short version of the original effort-reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. This measure is of interest in the context of assessing stressful work conditions in the era of economic globalization. METHODS: In a representative sample of 10,698 employed men and women participating in the longitudinal Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in Germany, a short version of the ERI questionnaire was included in the 2006 panel wave. Structural equation modeling and logistic regression analysis were applied. RESULTS: In addition to satisfactory internal consistency of scales, a model representing the theoretical structure of the scales provided the best data fit in a competitive test (RMSEA = 0.059, CAIC = 4124.19). Scoring high on the ERI scales was associated with elevated risks of poor self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: This short version of the ERI questionnaire reveals satisfactory psychometric properties, and can be recommended for further use in research and practice.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluate psychometric properties of a short version of the original effort-reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. This measure is of interest in the context of assessing stressful work conditions in the era of economic globalization. METHODS: In a representative sample of 10,698 employed men and women participating in the longitudinal Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in Germany, a short version of the ERI questionnaire was included in the 2006 panel wave. Structural equation modeling and logistic regression analysis were applied. RESULTS: In addition to satisfactory internal consistency of scales, a model representing the theoretical structure of the scales provided the best data fit in a competitive test (RMSEA = 0.059, CAIC = 4124.19). Scoring high on the ERI scales was associated with elevated risks of poor self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: This short version of the ERI questionnaire reveals satisfactory psychometric properties, and can be recommended for further use in research and practice.
Authors: Maria Carla Tabanelli; Marco Depolo; Robin M T Cooke; Guido Sarchielli; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Stefano Mattioli; Francesco S Violante Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Todd A Boyle; Andrea Bishop; Bobbi Morrison; Andrea Murphy; James Barker; Darren M Ashcroft; Denham Phipps; Thomas Mahaffey; Neil J MacKinnon Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2015-10-24
Authors: Adrian Loerbroks; Heng Meng; Min-Li Chen; Raphael Herr; Peter Angerer; Jian Li Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Rosane Härter Griep; Lucia Rotenberg; Ana Glória G Vasconcellos; Paul Landsbergis; Cláudia M Comaru; Márcia Guimarães M Alves Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Michela Vignoli; Dina Guglielmi; Roberta Bonfiglioli; Francesco Saverio Violante Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Jean-Baptist du Prel; Roma Runeson-Broberg; Peter Westerholm; Lars Alfredsson; Göran Fahlén; Anders Knutsson; Maria Nordin; Richard Peter Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Stéphanie Boini; Martin Kolopp; Michel Grzebyk; Guy Hédelin; Dominique Chouanière Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-08-03 Impact factor: 3.015