Literature DB >> 28536979

Quantifying Multiple Work-Related Psychosocial Risk Factors: Proposal for a Composite Indicator Based on the COPSOQ II.

Adrienne Stauder1, Katalin Nistor2,3, Tünde Zakor4, Anita Szabó4, Anikó Nistor2,3, Szilvia Ádám2, Barna Konkolÿ Thege2,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine national reference values for the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ II) across occupational sectors and develop a composite score to estimate the cumulative effect of multiple work-related stressors, in order to facilitate the implementation of occupational health directives on psychosocial risk assessment.
METHOD: Cross-sectional data was collected via an online questionnaire. The sample included 13,104 individuals and was representative of the general Hungarian adult working population in terms of gender, age, education, and occupation. Mean scores were calculated for 18 scales on work environment and for 5 outcome scales of the COPSOQ II across 18 occupational sectors. We analyzed the association between a composite psychosocial risk score (CPRS), reflecting severity of exposure to multiple risk factors, and high stress, burnout, sleep troubles, and poor self-rated health.
RESULTS: We found occupation-related differences in the mean scores on all COPSOQ II scales. Scores on the "Stress" scale ranged from 47.9 to 56.2, with the highest mean score in accommodation and food services sector. Variability was greatest with respect to emotional demands (range 40.3-67.6) and smallest with respect to role clarity (range 70.3-75.7). The prevalence of negative health outcomes increased with the CPRS. Five risk categories were formed, for which the odds ratio of negative outcomes ranged from 1.6 to 56.5.
CONCLUSION: The sector-specific psychosocial risk profiles covering 18 work environmental factors can be used as a reference in organizational surveys and international comparisons. The CPRS proved to be a powerful predictor of self-reported negative health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burnout; COPSOQ; Composite score; Occupational safety and health; Psychosocial risk; Sleep troubles; Work stress

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28536979     DOI: 10.1007/s12529-017-9651-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Med        ISSN: 1070-5503


  29 in total

1.  Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models?

Authors:  Hermann Burr; Karen Albertsen; Reiner Rugulies; Harald Hannerz
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  When workplace interventions lead to negative effects: learning from failures.

Authors:  Birgit Aust; Reiner Rugulies; Annett Finken; Chris Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Determining minimally important score differences in scales of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jan Hyld Pejtersen; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Peter Hasle
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sannie Vester Thorsen; Jakob Bue Bjorner
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire--a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment.

Authors:  Tage S Kristensen; Harald Hannerz; Annie Høgh; Vilhelm Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  The impact of cumulative childhood adversity on young adult mental health: measures, models, and interpretations.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schilling; Robert H Aseltine; Susan Gore
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  [Psychosocial risk exposure among wage earning population in Spain (2004-05): reference values of the 21 dimensions of COPSOQ ISTAS21 questionnaire].

Authors:  Salvador Moncada Lluís; Clara Llorens Serrano; Ariadna Font Corominas; Ariadna Galtés Camps; Albert Navarro Giné
Journal:  Rev Esp Salud Publica       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

8.  Job stress: its relationship to hospital pharmacists' insomnia and work outcomes.

Authors:  Ying-Chen Yeh; Blossom Yen-Ju Lin; Wen-Hung Lin; Thomas T H Wan
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06

9.  Work-related psychosocial risk factors and mental health problems amongst nurses at a university hospital in Estonia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tiina Freimann; Eda Merisalu
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 10.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assessing the Psychosocial Work Environment in Relation to Mental Health: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Faraz V Shahidi; Monique A M Gignac; John Oudyk; Peter M Smith
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Psychosocial risks factors among victim support workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study with the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sónia Caridade; Ana Oliveira; Rosa Saavedra; Rita Ribeiro; Manuela Santos; Iris Almeida; Cristina Soeiro
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  The Importance of Contextualized Psychosocial Risk Indicators in Workplace Stress Assessment: Evidence from the Healthcare Sector.

Authors:  Luca Menghini; Cristian Balducci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.