Literature DB >> 14759696

Effort-reward imbalance model and self-reported health: cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort.

Isabelle Niedhammer1, Marie-Ly Tek, Dagmar Starke, Johannes Siegrist.   

Abstract

Psychosocial factors at work have been found to be significant contributors to health, especially cardiovascular health. This study is aimed at exploring the relationship between psychosocial factors at work as defined by the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model and self-reported health, using alternative formulations of this model, and comparing cross-sectional and prospective analyses for a large occupational cohort of men and women. The French version of the ERI model was used to measure the three scales of effort, reward, and overcommitment. Self-reported health was used as health outcome. Covariates included chronic diseases, frequent depressive symptoms, and personal, occupational, and behavioural factors. The cross-sectional and prospective analyses concerned, respectively, 10175 and 6286 workers. Men and women were analysed separately. Cross-sectional analysis revealed that ERI was significantly associated with self-reported health whatever the formulation used (ratio over one, quartiles, continuous ratio, or log-transformed ratio) for both genders. When effort and reward were studied as two separate variables, reward was a significant risk factor for both genders, whereas effort was for men only. Overcommitment was also found to be a risk factor for self-reported health for both sex. Prospective analysis showed that ERI was a significant predictor of poor self-reported health for men and women for two formulations (continuous ratio and log-transformed ratio). For both genders, effort did not predict self-reported health, but reward did. Overcommitment was predictive of poor self-reported health for men only. Our results highlighted the predictive effects of the ERI model on self-reported health in a 1-year follow-up study. They urged to explore various formulations of the ERI model. They also underlined the need for longitudinal study design and separate analyses for men and women in the field of psychosocial factors at work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759696     DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00346-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  49 in total

1.  On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health--are they reliable?

Authors:  Töres Theorell; Hans Martin Hasselhorn
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Cohort profile: the GAZEL Cohort Study.

Authors:  Marcel Goldberg; Annette Leclerc; Sébastien Bonenfant; Jean François Chastang; Annie Schmaus; Nadine Kaniewski; Marie Zins
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-12       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Work stress and reduced health in young physicians: prospective evidence from Swiss residents.

Authors:  Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer; Richard Klaghofer; Martina Stamm; Johannes Siegrist; Claus Buddeberg
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Application of item response theory to achieve cross-cultural comparability of occupational stress measurement.

Authors:  Akizumi Tsutsumi; Noboru Iwata; Naotaka Watanabe; Jan de Jonge; Hynek Pikhart; Juan Antonio Fernández-López; Liying Xu; Richard Peter; Anders Knutsson; Isabelle Niedhammer; Norito Kawakami; Johannes Siegrist
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Primary school teachers in China: associations of organizational justice and effort-reward imbalance with burnout and intentions to leave the profession in a cross-sectional sample.

Authors:  Adrian Loerbroks; Heng Meng; Min-Li Chen; Raphael Herr; Peter Angerer; Jian Li
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Work stress and metabolic syndrome in radiologists: first evidence.

Authors:  Nicola Magnavita; Adriano Fileni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Effort-reward imbalance, sleep disturbances and fatigue.

Authors:  Göran Fahlén; Anders Knutsson; Richard Peter; Torbjörn Akerstedt; Maria Nordin; Lars Alfredsson; Peter Westerholm
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  The mediating and moderating role of personal strain and coping resource in the relationship between work stressor and quality of life among Chinese nurses.

Authors:  Si-Ying Wu; Huang-Yuan Li; Shu-Juan Yang; Wei Zhu; Xiao-Rong Wang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  The influence of occupational stress factors on the nicotine dependence: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Schmidt; Melanie Neumann; Markus Wirtz; Nicole Ernstmann; Andrea Staratschek-Jox; Erich Stoelben; Jürgen Wolf; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.600

10.  Perceived stress, sex and occupational status interact to increase the risk of future high blood pressure: the IPC cohort study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Wiernik; Hermann Nabi; Bruno Pannier; Sébastien Czernichow; Olivier Hanon; Tabassome Simon; Jean-Marc Simon; Frédérique Thomas; Cyril Ducolombier; Nicolas Danchin; Frédéric Limosin; Silla M Consoli; Cédric Lemogne
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.