Literature DB >> 1901743

A voltage-dependent gap junction in Drosophila melanogaster.

V K Verselis1, M V Bennett, T A Bargiello.   

Abstract

Steady-state and kinetic analyses of gap junctional conductance, gi, in salivary glands of Drosophila melanogaster third instar larvae reveal a strong and complex voltage dependence that can be elicited by two types of voltages. Voltages applied between the cells, i.e., transjunctional voltages, Vj, and those applied between the cytoplasm and the extracellular space, inside-outside voltages, Vi,o, markedly alter gj. Alteration of Vi-o while holding Vj = O,i.e., by equal displacement of the voltages in the cells, causes gj to increase to a maximum on hyperpolarization and to decrease to near zero on depolarization. These conductance changes associated with Vi-o are fit by a model in which there are two independent gates in series, one in each series, one in each membrane, where each gate is equally sensitive to Vi-o and exhibits first order kinetics. Vj's generated by applying voltage steps of either polarity to either cell, substantially reduce gj. These conductance changes exhibit complex kinetics that depend on Vi-o as well as Vj. At more positive Vi-o's, the changes in gj have two phases, an early phase consisting of of a decrease in gj for either polarity of Vj and a later phase consisting of an increase in gj on hyperpolarizing either cell and a decrease on depolarizing either cell. At negative Vi-o's in the plateau region of the gj-Vi-o relation, the later slow increase in gj is absent on hyperpolarizing either cell. Also, the early decrease in gj for either polarity of Vj is faster the more positive the Vi-o. The complex time course elicited by applying voltage steps to one cell can be explained as combined actions of Vi-o and Vj, with the early phase ascribable to Vj, but influenced by Vi-o, and the later phase to the changes in Vi-o associated with the generation of Vj. The substantially different kinetics and sensitivity of changes in gj by Vi-o and Vj suggests that the mechanisms of gating by these two voltages are different. Evidently, these gap-junction channels are capable of two distinct, but interactive forms of voltage dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1901743      PMCID: PMC1281124          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82204-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  27 in total

1.  Structural parts involved in activation and inactivation of the sodium channel.

Authors:  W Stühmer; F Conti; H Suzuki; X D Wang; M Noda; N Yahagi; H Kubo; S Numa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Properties of single gap junctional channels between isolated neonatal rat heart cells.

Authors:  M B Rook; H J Jongsma; A C van Ginneken
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-10

Review 3.  Electrophysiology of pancreatic and salivary acinar cells.

Authors:  O H Petersen; D V Gallacher
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 19.318

Review 4.  The structure of ion channels in membranes of excitable cells.

Authors:  N Unwin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Cloning and expression of a Xenopus embryonic gap junction protein.

Authors:  L Ebihara; E C Beyer; K I Swenson; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Formation of gap junctions by expression of connexins in Xenopus oocyte pairs.

Authors:  K I Swenson; J R Jordan; E C Beyer; D L Paul
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Gap junction structures. II. Analysis of the x-ray diffraction data.

Authors:  L Makowski; D L Caspar; W C Phillips; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Sequence and developmental expression of mRNA coding for a gap junction protein in Xenopus.

Authors:  R L Gimlich; N M Kumar; N B Gilula
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Sequence and tissue distribution of a second protein of hepatic gap junctions, Cx26, as deduced from its cDNA.

Authors:  J T Zhang; B J Nicholson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of metabolic communication through gap junction channels by transjunctional voltage; synergistic and antagonistic effects of gating and ionophoresis.

Authors:  Nicolás Palacios-Prado; Feliksas F Bukauskas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-10

2.  Molecular analysis of voltage dependence of heterotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A domain substitution procedure and its use to analyze voltage dependence of homotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Gap junction channel gating.

Authors:  Feliksas F Bukauskas; Vytas K Verselis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2004-03-23

Review 5.  Voltage-dependent conformational changes in connexin channels.

Authors:  Thaddeus A Bargiello; Qingxiu Tang; Seunghoon Oh; Taekyung Kwon
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-24

6.  Species-specific voltage-gating properties of connexin-45 junctions expressed in Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  L C Barrio; J Capel; J A Jarillo; C Castro; A Revilla
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Connexin32 gap junction channels in stably transfected cells. Equilibrium and kinetic properties.

Authors:  A P Moreno; B Eghbali; D C Spray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32 alone and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage.

Authors:  L C Barrio; T Suchyna; T Bargiello; L X Xu; R S Roginski; M V Bennett; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Functional alterations in gap junction channels formed by mutant forms of connexin 32: evidence for loss of function as a pathogenic mechanism in the X-linked form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  C K Abrams; M M Freidin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain.

Authors:  Roberto Bruzzone; Sheriar G Hormuzdi; Michael T Barbe; Anne Herb; Hannah Monyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.