Literature DB >> 1717979

Gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32 alone and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage.

L C Barrio1, T Suchyna, T Bargiello, L X Xu, R S Roginski, M V Bennett, B J Nicholson.   

Abstract

Gap junctions are formed by a family of homologous proteins termed connexins. Their channels are dodecamers, and homomeric forms differ in their properties with respect to control by voltage and other gating stimuli. We report here the properties of coupling from expression of connexin complementary RNAs (cRNAs; sense to mRNA, antisense to cDNA) in Xenopus oocyte pairs in which endogenous coupling was blocked by injection of DNA oligonucleotides antisense to the mRNA of Cx38, the principal endogenous connexin. We found that a connexin recently sequenced from rat liver, Cx26, formed functional gap junctions whose conductance exhibited voltage dependence with unusual characteristics suggestive of two gating mechanisms. Junctional conductance (gj) was increased to a small degree by depolarization and decreased by hyperpolarization of either cell in a coupled pair, indicating dependence on the potential between the inside and outside of the cells (Vi-o). These changes were fast compared with the resolution of their measurement (ca. 10 ms). On a slower timescale, large transjunctional potentials (Vj) of either sign caused a more substantial decrease in conductance similar to that previously reported for several other gap junctions. Homotypic junctions formed of another connexin, Cx32, exhibited a similar slow dependence on Vj but no dependence on Vi-o. In contrast, heterotypic junctions between an oocyte expressing Cx26 and one expressing Cx32 were electrically asymmetric; they exhibited a greater fast change in gj, which depended, however, on Vj, such that gj increased with relative positivity on the Cx26 side and decreased with relative negativity on the Cx26 side. There was also a large slow decrease in gj in response to Vj for relative positivity on the Cx26 side but not for Vj of the opposite sign. These data indicate that properties of the hemichannels contributed by the two connexins in the heterotypic case were changed from their properties in homotypic junctions. The fast change in gj may involve a mechanism analogous to that at fast rectifying electrical synapses. Experiments in which oocytes expressing Cx32 were paired with oocytes expressing both Cx26 and Cx32 demonstrated that asymmetric junctions would form between oocytes expressing both connexins, thereby confirming their potential relevance in vivo, where the same coupled cells are known to express both proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1717979      PMCID: PMC52518          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

Review 1.  Gap junctions: new tools, new answers, new questions.

Authors:  M V Bennett; L C Barrio; T A Bargiello; D C Spray; E Hertzberg; J C Sáez
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A voltage-dependent gap junction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Expression of functional cell-cell channels from cloned rat liver gap junction complementary DNA.

Authors:  G Dahl; T Miller; D Paul; R Voellmy; R Werner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Electrical properties of the gap junctional membrane studied in rat liver cell pairs.

Authors:  E C Reverdin; R Weingart
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-02

5.  Two homologous protein components of hepatic gap junctions.

Authors:  B Nicholson; R Dermietzel; D Teplow; O Traub; K Willecke; J P Revel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Oct 22-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Formation of gap junctions by expression of connexins in Xenopus oocyte pairs.

Authors:  K I Swenson; J R Jordan; E C Beyer; D L Paul
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-04-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Molecular cloning and characterization of a new member of the gap junction gene family, connexin-31.

Authors:  J H Hoh; S A John; J P Revel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Functional analysis of human cardiac gap junction channel mutants.

Authors:  G I Fishman; A P Moreno; D C Spray; L A Leinwand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein.

Authors:  D L Paul
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  130 in total

1.  Different ionic selectivities for connexins 26 and 32 produce rectifying gap junction channels.

Authors:  T M Suchyna; J M Nitsche; M Chilton; A L Harris; R D Veenstra; B J Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Voltage clamp limitations of dual whole-cell gap junction current and voltage recordings. I. Conductance measurements.

Authors:  R D Veenstra
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Modulation of metabolic communication through gap junction channels by transjunctional voltage; synergistic and antagonistic effects of gating and ionophoresis.

Authors:  Nicolás Palacios-Prado; Feliksas F Bukauskas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-09-10

4.  Molecular analysis of voltage dependence of heterotypic gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32.

Authors:  J B Rubin; V K Verselis; M V Bennett; T A Bargiello
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Mouse Cx50, a functional member of the connexin family of gap junction proteins, is the lens fiber protein MP70.

Authors:  T W White; R Bruzzone; D A Goodenough; D L Paul
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 6.  Role of connexin-based gap junction channels and hemichannels in ischemia-induced cell death in nervous tissue.

Authors:  Jorge E Contreras; Helmuth A Sánchez; Loreto P Véliz; Feliksas F Bukauskas; Michael V L Bennett; Juan C Sáez
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2004-12

7.  Pannexins, a family of gap junction proteins expressed in brain.

Authors:  Roberto Bruzzone; Sheriar G Hormuzdi; Michael T Barbe; Anne Herb; Hannah Monyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Longitudinal distribution of components of excitatory synaptic input to motoneurones during swimming in young Xenopus tadpoles: experiments with antagonists.

Authors:  F Y Zhao; E Wolf; A Roberts
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Molecular cloning and functional expression of human connexin37, an endothelial cell gap junction protein.

Authors:  K E Reed; E M Westphale; D M Larson; H Z Wang; R D Veenstra; E C Beyer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Connexin hemichannel and pannexin channel electrophysiology: how do they differ?

Authors:  Dakshesh Patel; Xian Zhang; Richard D Veenstra
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.