Literature DB >> 19016576

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: a review of its use in the prevention of renal transplant rejection.

Mark Sanford1, Gillian M Keating.   

Abstract

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (Myfortic) is a reversible, noncompetitive inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibitor that is approved in the EU, the US and in other countries worldwide for immunosuppressive prophylaxis against graft rejection in adult renal transplant patients.Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium has a delayed absorption from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in comparison with mycophenolate mofetil, thereby potentially reducing GI adverse events. In randomized, double-blind trials of de novo and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant patients receiving ciclosporin emulsion-based regimens, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium was as effective as mycophenolate mofetil in preventing renal graft rejection. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium provides an alternative to mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of de novo renal transplant recipients and ongoing research should indicate whether an intensified dosage regimen can further improve clinical outcomes. Renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil maintenance immunosuppressive therapy may be switched to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium without compromising efficacy.The general tolerability profile of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium was similar to that of mycophenolate mofetil. Patients selected for GI intolerance associated with mycophenolate mofetil treatment showed reductions in GI symptoms when switched to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium, while in unselected patients in comparative trials, there was no difference between enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in GI tolerability. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium provides an alternative to mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil maintenance immunosuppressive therapy who have GI symptoms that have not responded to other management strategies, because they may experience improvement if switched to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Thus, in association with ciclosporin-based regimens, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium is a valuable treatment option for immunosuppressive prophylaxis in adult renal transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19016576     DOI: 10.2165/0003495-200868170-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  68 in total

Review 1.  Induction therapy in renal transplantation : an overview of current developments.

Authors:  Gaetano Ciancio; George W Burke; Joshua Miller
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Noninfectious gastrointestinal (GI) complications of mycophenolic acid therapy: a consequence of local GI toxicity?

Authors:  W Arns
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and metabolic investigations of mycophenolic acid in pediatric patients after renal transplantation: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring. German Study Group on Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  M Oellerich; M Shipkova; E Schütz; E Wieland; L Weber; B Tönshoff; V W Armstrong
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Long-term administration of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic) is safe in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  M Salvadori; H Holzer; G Civati; H Sollinger; B Lien; S Tomlanovich; E Bertoni; Y Seifu; A C Marrast
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.975

5.  Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes.

Authors:  Klemens Budde; Petra Glander; Bernhard K Krämer; Wolfgang Fischer; Ute Hoffmann; Steffen Bauer; Jana Grohmann; Hans-Hellmut Neumayer; Wolfgang Arns
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a review of its use in the management of solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  A Bardsley-Elliot; S Noble; R H Foster
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  R E Bullingham; A J Nicholls; B R Kamm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial.

Authors:  Teun van Gelder; Helio Tedesco Silva; Johan W de Fijter; Klemens Budde; Dirk Kuypers; Gunnar Tyden; Aleksander Lohmus; Claudia Sommerer; Anders Hartmann; Yann Le Meur; Michael Oellerich; David W Holt; Burkhard Tönshoff; Paul Keown; Scott Campbell; Richard D Mamelok
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid acyl glucuronide are not associated with diarrhea in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  T Heller; T van Gelder; K Budde; J W de Fijter; D Kuypers; W Arns; J Schmidt; L Rostaing; S H Powis; K Claesson; I A M Macphee; E Pohanka; J Engelmayer; G Brandhorst; M Oellerich; V W Armstrong
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Renal function with cyclosporine C2 monitoring, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and basiliximab: a 12-month randomized trial in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Diane Cibrik; Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche; Barbara Bresnahan; You Min Wu; Goran Klintmalm; Clifton E Kew; Paul C Kuo; John Whelchel; David Cohen; Prabakar Baliga; Enver Akalin; Enrico Benedetti; Francis Wright; Bonnie Lieberman; Bettina Ulbricht; Stephen Jensik
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.863

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The influence of UGT polymorphisms as biomarkers in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Robert Dupuis; Andrea Yuen; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  Effects of mycophenolate sodium on mucociliary clearance using a bronchial section and anastomosis rodent model.

Authors:  Viviane Ferreira Paes E Silva; Rogerio Pazetti; Sonia de Fatima Soto; Mariana Moreira Quinhones Siqueira; Aristides Tadeu Correia; Fabio Biscegli Jatene; Paulo Manuel Pego-Fernandes
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 3.  Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate in systemic sclerosis. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mohammed A Omair; Abdulaziz Alahmadi; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate sodium co-administered with tacrolimus in the first year after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Joanna Sobiak; Matylda Resztak; Maciej Głyda; Paulina Szczepaniak; Maria Chrzanowska
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 5.  Ongoing clinical trials and treatment options for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Donald P Tashkin; Christopher P Denton; Martin W Lubell; Cristina Vazquez-Mateo; Stephen Wax
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.