Literature DB >> 9646007

Clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil.

R E Bullingham1, A J Nicholls, B R Kamm.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil have been investigated in healthy volunteers and mainly in recipients of renal allografts. Following oral administration, mycophenolate mofetil was rapidly and completely absorbed, and underwent extensive presystemic de-esterification. Systemic plasma clearance of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil was around 10 L/min in healthy individuals, and plasma mycophenolate mofetil concentrations fell below the quantitation limit (0.4 mg/L) within 10 minutes of the cessation of infusion. Similar plasma mycophenolate mofetil concentrations were seen after intravenous administration in patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment, implying that the de-esterification process had not been substantially affected. Mycophenolic acid, the active immunosuppressant species, is glucuronidated to a stable phenolic glucuronide (MPAG) which is not pharmacologically active. Over 90% of the administered dose is eventually excreted in the urine, mostly as MPAG. The magnitude of the MPAG renal clearance indicates that active tubular secretion of MPAG must occur. At clinically relevant concentrations, mycophenolic acid and MPAG are about 97% and 82% bound to albumin, respectively. MPAG at high (but clinically realisable) concentrations reduced the plasma binding of mycophenolic acid. The mean maximum plasma mycophenolic acid concentration (Cmax) after a mycophenolate mofetil 1 g dose in healthy individuals was around 25 mg/L, occurred at 0.8 hours postdose, decayed with a mean apparent half-life (t1/2) of around 16 hours, and generated a mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC infinity) of around 64 mg.h/L. Intra- and interindividual coefficients of variation for the AUC infinity of the drug were estimated to be 25% and 10%, respectively. Intravenous and oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil showed statistically equivalent MPA AUC infinity values in healthy individuals. Compared with mycophenolic acid, MPAG showed a roughly similar Cmax about 1 hour after mycophenolic acid Cmax, with a similar t1/2 and an AUC infinity about 5-fold larger than that for mycophenolic acid. Secondary mycophenolic acid peaks represent a significant enterohepatic cycling process. Since MPAG was the sole material excreted in bile, entrohepatic cycling must involve colonic bacterial deconjugation of MPAG. An oral cholestyramine interaction study showed that the mean contribution of entrohepatic cycling to the AUC infinity of mycophenolic acid was around 40% with a range of 10 to 60%. The pharmacokinetics of patients with renal transplants (after 3 months or more) compared with those of healthy individuals were similar after oral mycophenolate mofetil. Immediately post-transplant, the mean Cmax and AUC infinity of mycophenolic acid were 30 to 50% of those in the 3-month post-transplant patients. These parameters rose slowly over the 3-month interval. Slow metabolic changes, rather than poor absorption, seem responsible for this nonstationarity, since intravenous and oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil in the immediate post-transplant period generated comparable MPA AUC infinity values. Renal impairment had no major effect on the pharmacokinetic of mycophenolic acid after single doses of mycophenolate mofetil, but there was a progressive decrease in MPAG clearance as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declined. Compared to individuals with a normal GFR, patients with severe renal impairment (GFR 1.5 L/h/1.73m2) showed 3-to 6-fold higher MPAG AUC values. In rental transplant recipients during acute renal impairment in the early post-transplant period, the plasma MPA concentrations were comparable to those in patients without renal failure, whereas plasma MPAG concentrations were 2- to 3-fold higher. Haemodialysis had no major effect on plasma mycophenolic acid or MPAG. Dosage adjustments appear to not be necessary either in renal impairment or during dialysis. (ABSTRACT TRUN

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9646007     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199834060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  25 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil in healthy subjects after single-dose oral and intravenous administration.

Authors:  R Bullingham; S Monroe; A Nicholls; M Hale
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (RS61443): a short review.

Authors:  R E Bullingham; A Nicholls; M Hale
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Pilot study of mycophenolate mofetil (RS-61443) in the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation in Japanese patients. RS-61443 Investigation Committee--Japan.

Authors:  K Takahashi; T Ochiai; K Uchida; T Yasumura; M Ishibashi; S Suzuki; O Otsubo; K Isono; H Takagi; T Oka
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and intravenous ganciclovir alone and in combination in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  E J Wolfe; V Mathur; S Tomlanovich; D Jung; R Wong; K Griffy; F T Aweeka
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Blood distribution of mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  L J Langman; D F LeGatt; R W Yatscoff
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Placebo-controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil combined with cyclosporin and corticosteroids for prevention of acute rejection. European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A blinded, randomized clinical trial of mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation. The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Structure and mechanism of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase in complex with the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid.

Authors:  M D Sintchak; M A Fleming; O Futer; S A Raybuck; S P Chambers; P R Caron; M A Murcko; K P Wilson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Mycophenolic acid binding to human serum albumin: characterization and relation to pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  I Nowak; L M Shaw
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Effects of food and antacid on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of mycophenolate mofetil in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  R Bullingham; J Shah; R Goldblum; M Schiff
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  147 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs.

Authors:  A Johnston; D W Holt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Enterohepatic circulation: physiological, pharmacokinetic and clinical implications.

Authors:  Michael S Roberts; Beatrice M Magnusson; Frank J Burczynski; Michael Weiss
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Multiple peaking phenomena in pharmacokinetic disposition.

Authors:  Neal M Davies; Jody K Takemoto; Dion R Brocks; Jaime A Yáñez
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Associations between polymorphisms in target, metabolism, or transport proteins of mycophenolate sodium and therapeutic or adverse effects in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Nicolas Picard; Antoine Thierry; Guy Touchard; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Mycophenolate mofetil: fully utilizing its benefits for GvHD prophylaxis.

Authors:  Kentaro Minagawa; Motohiro Yamamori; Yoshio Katayama; Toshimitsu Matsui
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Positive bias in mycophenolic acid concentrations determined by the CEDIA assay compared to HPLC-UV method: is CEDIA assay suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid?

Authors:  Amitava Dasgupta; Myrtle Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 8.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Pharmacogenetic effect of the UGT polymorphisms on mycophenolate is modified by calcineurin inhibitors.

Authors:  L'aurelle A Johnson; William S Oetting; Saonli Basu; Susie Prausa; Arthur Matas; Pamala A Jacobson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Pharmacokinetic role of protein binding of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Brenda C M de Winter; Teun van Gelder; Ferdi Sombogaard; Leslie M Shaw; Reinier M van Hest; Ron A A Mathot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.