Literature DB >> 18946341

Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial.

Teun van Gelder1, Helio Tedesco Silva, Johan W de Fijter, Klemens Budde, Dirk Kuypers, Gunnar Tyden, Aleksander Lohmus, Claudia Sommerer, Anders Hartmann, Yann Le Meur, Michael Oellerich, David W Holt, Burkhard Tönshoff, Paul Keown, Scott Campbell, Richard D Mamelok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces the incidence of acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. The Fixed-Dose Concentration Controlled trial assessed the feasibility and potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving MMF after de novo renal transplant.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to a concentration-controlled (n=452; target exposure 45 mg hr/L) or a fixed-dose (n=449) MMF-containing regimen. The primary endpoint was treatment failure (a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, death, or MMF discontinuation) by 12 months posttransplantation.
RESULTS: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposures for both groups were similar at most time points and were below 30 mg hr/L in 37.3% of patients at day 3. There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failure (25.6% vs. 25.7%, P=0.81) or BPAR (14.9% vs. 15.5%, P>0.05) between the concentration-controlled and the fixed-dose groups, respectively. We did find a significant relationship between MPA-area under the concentration-time curve on day 3 and the incidence of BPAR in the first month (P=0.009) or in the first year posttransplantation (P=0.006). For later time points (day 10, month 1) there was no significant relationship between area under the concentration-time curve and BPAR (0.2572 and 0.5588, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failure between the concentration-controlled and the fixed-dose groups. The applied protocol of MMF dose adjustments based on target MPA exposure was not successful, partly because physicians seemed reluctant to implement substantial dose changes. Current initial MMF doses underexpose more than 35% of patients early after transplantation, increasing the risk for BPAR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18946341     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  58 in total

1.  Large scale analysis of routine dose adjustments of mycophenolate mofetil based on global exposure in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Franck Saint-Marcoux; Soizic Vandierdonck; Aurélie Prémaud; Jean Debord; Annick Rousseau; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 2.  The influence of pharmacogenetics and cofactors on clinical outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Nicolas Picard; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  Generic immunosuppressants.

Authors:  Mara Medeiros; Julia Lumini; Noah Stern; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Guido Filler
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Polymorphisms in type I and II inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase genes and association with clinical outcome in patients on mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Olivier Gensburger; Ron H N Van Schaik; Nicolas Picard; Yannick Le Meur; Annick Rousseau; Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Teun Van Gelder; Pierre Marquet
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  The CYP3A4*22 allele affects the predictive value of a pharmacogenetic algorithm predicting tacrolimus predose concentrations.

Authors:  Laure Elens; Dennis A Hesselink; Ron H N van Schaik; Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  How accurate and precise are limited sampling strategies in estimating exposure to mycophenolic acid in people with autoimmune disease?

Authors:  Azrin N Abd Rahman; Susan E Tett; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Mycophenolate mofetil-related leukopenia in children and young adults following kidney transplantation: Influence of genes and drugs.

Authors:  Charles D Varnell; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Cassie L Kirby; Lisa J Martin; Barry L Warshaw; Hiren P Patel; Deepa H Chand; Gina-Marie Barletta; Scott K Van Why; Rene G VanDeVoorde; Donald J Weaver; Amy Wilson; Priya S Verghese; Alexander A Vinks; Larry A Greenbaum; Jens Goebel; David K Hooper
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2017-09-04

8.  Pharmacokinetic role of protein binding of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Brenda C M de Winter; Teun van Gelder; Ferdi Sombogaard; Leslie M Shaw; Reinier M van Hest; Ron A A Mathot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Mycophenolate pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in belatacept treated renal allograft recipients - a pilot study.

Authors:  Sara Bremer; Nils T Vethe; Helge Rootwelt; Pål F Jørgensen; Jean Stenstrøm; Hallvard Holdaas; Karsten Midtvedt; Stein Bergan
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics and Relapse in Children with Steroid-Dependent Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tellier; Aymeric Dallocchio; Vincent Guigonis; Frank Saint-Marcoux; Brigitte Llanas; Lydia Ichay; Flavio Bandin; Astrid Godron; Denis Morin; Karine Brochard; Peggy Gandia; Stéphane Bouchet; Pierre Marquet; Stéphane Decramer; Jérôme Harambat
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.