Clare Harrop1, Desiree R Jones2, Noah J Sasson2, Shuting Zheng3, Sallie W Nowell4, Julia Parish-Morris5,6. 1. Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas. 3. STAR Center for ASD and NDDs, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 4. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Center for Autism Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 6. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Emerging research suggests social attention in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) girls is enhanced relative to ASD boys but may also be affected by the type of social and nonsocial content presented. This study examined how biological sex and gender norms interact to influence visual attention in 79 school-aged children observing scenes that included gender-associated toys and actors of both sexes. Attention to social (faces) and object activity (hands with toys) stimuli was measured. Previously described distinctions between social attention in ASD boys and girls were replicated, with ASD girls looking more at faces than ASD boys. Irrespective of diagnosis, males and females attended more to actors that shared their same sex, and attended more to toys with gender-associations that were consistent with their own sex, suggesting that social and object salience increases for children under sex-consistent conditions. Importantly, ASD and typically developing (TD) children increased their gaze to faces when male actors were shown playing with female-associated toys, suggesting that both groups of children are sensitive to societal messages about the acceptability of males playing with female-associated toys. Our findings provide further evidence of heightened attention to faces in ASD girls relative to ASD boys, and indicate that social attention in ASD and TD children is influenced by who (male or female actor) and what (male- or female-associated toy) is being observed. Collectively, these results present a nuanced profile of attention in ASD that adds to a growing body of research indicating subtle phenotypic differences in ASD girls that may impact identification, assessment, and intervention. Autism Res 2020, 13: 763-776..
Emerging research suggests social attention in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) girls is enhanced relative to ASD boys but may also be affected by the type of social and nonsocial content presented. This study examined how biological sex and gender norms interact to influence visual attention in 79 school-aged children observing scenes that included gender-associated toys and actors of both sexes. Attention to social (faces) and object activity (hands with toys) stimuli was measured. Previously described distinctions between social attention in ASD boys and girls were replicated, with ASD girls looking more at faces than ASD boys. Irrespective of diagnosis, males and females attended more to actors that shared their same sex, and attended more to toys with gender-associations that were consistent with their own sex, suggesting that social and object salience increases for children under sex-consistent conditions. Importantly, ASD and typically developing (TD) children increased their gaze to faces when male actors were shown playing with female-associated toys, suggesting that both groups of children are sensitive to societal messages about the acceptability of males playing with female-associated toys. Our findings provide further evidence of heightened attention to faces in ASD girls relative to ASD boys, and indicate that social attention in ASD and TD children is influenced by who (male or female actor) and what (male- or female-associated toy) is being observed. Collectively, these results present a nuanced profile of attention in ASD that adds to a growing body of research indicating subtle phenotypic differences in ASD girls that may impact identification, assessment, and intervention. Autism Res 2020, 13: 763-776..
Authors: Coralie Chevallier; Julia Parish-Morris; Alana McVey; Keiran M Rump; Noah J Sasson; John D Herrington; Robert T Schultz Journal: Autism Res Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Alycia K Halladay; Somer Bishop; John N Constantino; Amy M Daniels; Katheen Koenig; Kate Palmer; Daniel Messinger; Kevin Pelphrey; Stephan J Sanders; Alison Tepper Singer; Julie Lounds Taylor; Peter Szatmari Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 7.509
Authors: Z Ambarchi; K A Boulton; R Thapa; E E Thomas; M M DeMayo; N J Sasson; I B Hickie; Adam J Guastella Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Meredith Cola; Lisa D Yankowitz; Kimberly Tena; Alison Russell; Leila Bateman; Azia Knox; Samantha Plate; Laura S Cubit; Casey J Zampella; Juhi Pandey; Robert T Schultz; Julia Parish-Morris Journal: Mol Autism Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 7.509
Authors: Blythe A Corbett; Jessica M Schwartzman; Erin J Libsack; Rachael A Muscatello; Matthew D Lerner; Grace L Simmons; Susan W White Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Amber Song; Meredith Cola; Samantha Plate; Victoria Petrulla; Lisa Yankowitz; Juhi Pandey; Robert T Schultz; Julia Parish-Morris Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 8.265