Literature DB >> 19015499

Super Memory Bros.: going from mirror patterns to concordant patterns via similarity enhancements.

Jason D Ozubko1, Steve Joordens.   

Abstract

When memory is contrasted for stimuli belonging to distinct stimulus classes, one of two patterns is observed: a mirror pattern, in which one stimulus gives rise to higher hits but lower false alarms (e.g., the frequency-based mirror effect) or a concordant pattern, in which one stimulus class gives rise both to higher hits and to higher false alarms (e.g., the pseudoword effect). On the basis of the dual-process account proposed by Joordens and Hockley (2000), we predict that mirror patterns occur when one stimulus class is more familiar and less distinctive than another, whereas concordant patterns occur when one stimulus class is more familiar than another. We tested these assumptions within a video game paradigm using novel stimuli that allow manipulations in terms of distinctiveness and familiarity (via similarity). When more distinctive, less familiar items are contrasted with less distinctive, more familiar items, a mirror pattern is observed. Systematically enhancing the familiarity of stimuli transforms the mirror pattern to a concordant pattern as predicted. Although our stimuli differ considerably from those used in examinations of the frequency-based mirror effect and the pseudoword effect, the implications of our findings with respect to those phenomena are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19015499     DOI: 10.3758/MC.36.8.1391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Recognition memory for novel stimuli: the structural regularity hypothesis.

Authors:  Anne M Cleary; Alison L Morris; Moses M Langley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?

Authors:  S R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-11

5.  A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.

Authors:  T Valentine
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

6.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

7.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: symmetry in motion.

Authors:  A Hilford; M Glanzer; K Kim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

9.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam.

Authors:  Kenneth J Malmberg; Rene Zeelenberg; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.