Literature DB >> 15238022

Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.

Amy H Criss1, Richard M Shiffrin.   

Abstract

In studies of episodic recognition memory, low-frequency words (LF) have higher hit rates (HR) and lower false alarm rates (FAR) than do high-frequency words (HF), which is known as the mirror pattern. A few findings have suggested that requiring a task at study may reduce or eliminate the LF-HR advantage without altering the LF-FAR effect. Other studies have suggested that the size of the LF-HR advantage interacts with study time. To explore such findings more thoroughly and relate them to theory, the authors conducted 5 experiments, varying study time and study task. The full mirror pattern was found only in 2 cases: the standard condition requiring study for a later memory test and a condition requiring a judgment about unusual letters. The authors explain their findings in terms of the encoding of distinctive features and discuss the implications for current theories of recognition memory and the word frequency effect. Copyright 2004 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15238022     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition.

Authors:  Amy H Criss; Richard M Shiffrin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

3.  Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Gina A Glanc; Robert L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

4.  Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.

Authors:  Paul S Merritt; Edward L DeLosh; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12

5.  Memory for objects in canonical and noncanonical viewpoints.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Jennifer Shutter; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

6.  Super Memory Bros.: going from mirror patterns to concordant patterns via similarity enhancements.

Authors:  Jason D Ozubko; Steve Joordens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

7.  Pathway control in visual word processing: converging evidence from recognition memory.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang; David A Balota; Melvin J Yap
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-08

8.  Analytic Expressions for the BCDMEM Model of Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Jay I Myung; Maximiliano Montenegro; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.

Authors:  William E Hockley; Marty W Niewiadomski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

10.  Examining the role of context variability in memory for items and associations.

Authors:  William R Aue; Jessica M Fontaine; Amy H Criss
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.