Literature DB >> 19015071

Impact of a mammography screening programme on the breast cancer population of the Region of Valencia (Spain).

Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo1, Josefa Miranda, Isabel Chirivella, Josefa Ibáñez, Begona Bermejo, Carmen Pons, Inmaculada Melchor, Ana Santaballa, Francisco Martínez-Ruiz, Ana Lluch, Dolores Salas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Randomised clinical trials with a control arm of non-screened patients are nowadays ethically impossible. The aim of this study was to establish the impact of mammography screening on a non-selected population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 2002, 3662 patients were included, 2313 in the screened group and 1349 in the unscreened group.
RESULTS: 55.3% of the screened patients were diagnosed in stage I vs. 26.1% in the non-screened group. The proportion of stage III-IV was 4.6% and 19.8% for the screened and unscreened groups respectively (p<0.001). 48.8% in the screening group were submitted to mastectomy vs. 66.4% of the unscreened patients (p<0.001). Overall survival was superior for the prevalent cases in the screening group, with a relative risk of 0.49, and was not significant for the incident cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of breast cancer in the mammography screening programme of the Region of Valencia significantly increases conservative surgery rates and suggests an improvement in survival in prevalent cases. The increased rate of early stages in these patients could be the main reason of this benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19015071     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-008-0281-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  16 in total

1.  Oestrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: past, present and future.

Authors:  D M Barnes; A M Hanby
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; S W Duffy; M F Yen; C F Chiang; U B Krusemo; T Tot; R A Smith
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Helene Olsen; Sisse H Njor; Ilse Vejborg; Walter Schwartz; Peter Dalgaard; Maj-Britt Jensen; Ulla Brix Tange; Mogens Blichert-Toft; Fritz Rank; Henning Mouridsen; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-13

6.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Periodic screening for breast cancer: the HIP Randomized Controlled Trial. Health Insurance Plan.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1997

8.  Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older.

Authors:  Gary M Freedman; Penny R Anderson; Lori J Goldstein; Alexandra L Hanlon; Mary E Cianfrocca; Michael M Millenson; Margaret von Mehren; Michael H Torosian; Marsha C Boraas; Nicos Nicolaou; Arthur S Patchefsky; Kathryn Evers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening.

Authors:  Miranda F Ernst; Adri C Voogd; Jan Willem W Coebergh; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening.

Authors:  P J Klemi; S Toikkanen; O Räsänen; I Parvinen; H Joensuu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stage at breast cancer diagnosis and distance from diagnostic hospital in a periurban setting: a South African public hospital case series of over 1,000 women.

Authors:  Caroline Dickens; Maureen Joffe; Judith Jacobson; Francois Venter; Joachim Schüz; Herbert Cubasch; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 7.396

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.