Literature DB >> 10943268

The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up.

L Tabár1, B Vitak, H H Chen, S W Duffy, M F Yen, C F Chiang, U B Krusemo, T Tot, R A Smith.   

Abstract

The benefit of invitation to mammographic screening observed in this trial is maintained as a highly significant 32% reduction in breast cancer mortality. Mammographic screening for breast cancer continues to save lives after up to 20 years. Screening derives this benefit by improving the distribution of tumors diagnosed with respect to prognostic categories based on node status, size, and histology of tumors. There is potential for modern screening programs with shorter interscreening intervals to achieve even greater improvements in prognostic category and greater reductions in breast cancer mortality. Mammography can discriminate a subpopulation of high-risk cases, those displaying casting-type calcifications on the mammogram, among very small tumors, with fundamental implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943268     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70191-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  74 in total

1.  Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Breast screening review--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  M J Michell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity.

Authors:  Wasfi I Suleiman; Sarah J Lewis; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Michael G Evanoff; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-05-07

5.  Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Donald A Berry; Yaojen Chang; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Wenli Dong; Roman Gulati; Marc D Ryser; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Stage shift in PSA-detected prostate cancers - effect modification by Gleason score.

Authors:  Nora Pashayan; Paul Pharoah; David E Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Jenny Donovan; Richard M Martin; David Greenberg; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Tumor dormancy due to failure of angiogenesis: role of the microenvironment.

Authors:  George N Naumov; Judah Folkman; Oddbjorn Straume
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  The diffuse type of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology and prognosis.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Evaluation of extension of breast screening to women aged 65-70 in England using screening performance measures.

Authors:  R L Bennett; R G Blanks; S M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.