Literature DB >> 19013065

Cockroaches keep predators guessing by using preferred escape trajectories.

Paolo Domenici1, David Booth, Jonathan M Blagburn, Jonathan P Bacon.   

Abstract

Antipredator behavior is vital for most animals and calls for accurate timing and swift motion. Whereas fast reaction times [1] and predictable, context-dependent escape-initiation distances [2] are common features of most escape systems, previous work has highlighted the need for unpredictability in escape directions, in order to prevent predators from learning a repeated, fixed pattern [3-5]. Ultimate unpredictability would result from random escape trajectories. Although this strategy would deny any predictive power to the predator, it would also result in some escape trajectories toward the threat. Previous work has shown that escape trajectories are in fact generally directed away from the threat, although with a high variability [5-8]. However, the rules governing this variability are largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that individual cockroaches (Periplaneta americana, a much-studied model prey species [9-14]) keep each escape unpredictable by running along one of a set of preferred trajectories at fixed angles from the direction of the threatening stimulus. These results provide a new paradigm for understanding the behavioral strategies for escape responses, underscoring the need to revisit the neural mechanisms controlling escape directions in the cockroach and similar animal models, and the evolutionary forces driving unpredictable, or "protean"[3], antipredator behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19013065      PMCID: PMC2678410          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  Do cockroaches 'know' about fluid dynamics?

Authors:  D Rinberg; H Davidowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Computational model of the cockroach escape behavior: winner and losers in a population code.

Authors:  Erez A Ezrachi
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Parallel motor pathways from thoracic interneurons of the ventral giant interneuron system of the cockroach, Periplaneta americana.

Authors:  R E Ritzmann; A J Pollack
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Correlation of filiform hair position with sensory afferent morphology and synaptic connections in the second instar cockroach.

Authors:  K S Thompson; J M Blagburn; C R Gibbon; J P Bacon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1992-06-08       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Filter characteristics of cercal afferents in the cockroach.

Authors:  Y Kondoh; T Arima; J Okuma; Y Hasegawa
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Regeneration of cercal filiform hair sensory neurons in the first-instar cockroach restores escape behavior.

Authors:  M Stern; V L Ediger; C R Gibbon; J M Blagburn; J P Bacon
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1997-10

7.  Protean defence by prey animals.

Authors:  D A Humphries; P M Driver
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Wind-activated thoracic interneurons of the cockroach: I. Responses to controlled wind stimulation.

Authors:  J Westin; R E Ritzmann; D J Goddard
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1988-10

9.  Wind-activated thoracic interneurons of the cockroach: II. Patterns of connection from ventral giant interneurons.

Authors:  R E Ritzmann; A J Pollack
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1988-10

10.  Cartesian representation of stimulus direction: parallel processing by two sets of giant interneurons in the cockroach.

Authors:  L Kolton; J M Camhi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.836

  10 in total
  35 in total

Review 1.  Active touch in orthopteroid insects: behaviours, multisensory substrates and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher Comer; Yoshichika Baba
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Bearing selection in ball-rolling dung beetles: is it constant?

Authors:  Emily Baird; Marcus J Byrne; Clarke H Scholtz; Eric J Warrant; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Report on a symposium on Invertebrate Models of Behavior and Circuit Plasticity.

Authors:  Robert J Walker
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-16

4.  Escaping away from and towards a threat: the cockroach's strategy for staying alive.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; David Booth; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-11

Review 5.  Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories.

Authors:  Paolo Domenici; Jonathan M Blagburn; Jonathan P Bacon
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Not so fast: giant interneurons control precise movements of antennal scales during escape behavior of crayfish.

Authors:  Jens Herberholz; Matthew E Swierzbinski; Austin Widjaja; Armand Kohn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Neurocognitive free will.

Authors:  Thomas T Hills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Flies dynamically anti-track, rather than ballistically escape, aversive odor during flight.

Authors:  Sara Wasserman; Patrick Lu; Jacob W Aptekar; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Collision-avoidance behaviors of minimally restrained flying locusts to looming stimuli.

Authors:  R W M Chan; F Gabbiani
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.