Literature DB >> 28626839

Auditory-Tactile integration: Effects of Phase of Sinusoidal Stimulation at 50 and 250 Hz.

Parivash Ranjbar1, E Courtenay Wilson2, Charlotte M Reed2, Louis D Braida2.   

Abstract

The perceptual integration of 50- and 250-Hz, 500-ms vibrotactile and auditory tones was studied in detection experiments as a function of the relative phase (0°, 72°, 144°, 216°, and 288°) of the tone pulses. Vibrotactile stimuli were delivered through a single-channel vibrator to the left middle fingertip and auditory stimuli were presented diotically through headphones in a background of 50 dB SPL broadband noise. The observers were four adults with normal hearing. The vibrotactile and auditory stimulus levels used each yielded 63-77%-Correct unimodal detection performance in a two-interval two-alternative forced-choice task. Scores for the auditory-alone and tactile-alone conditions averaged roughly 70%-Correct. Mean scores for the auditory plus tactile conditions averaged across different phases were 77.1%-Correct at 50 Hz and 79.6%-Correct at 250 Hz. At 50 Hz, no differences in performance were observed as a function of the relative phase at which the combined auditory and tactile signals were presented. At 250 Hz, significantly higher scores were observed for one phase combination (72°) compared to two of the other four relative phases. Performance on the auditory plus tactile conditions resulted in significant integrative effects and was generally more consistent with a "Pythagorean Sum" model than with either an "Algebraic Sum" or an "Optimum Single Cannel" model of perceptual integration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory-tactile; detection; integration; multisensory; phase

Year:  2016        PMID: 28626839      PMCID: PMC5472392     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eng Technol Sci Innov


  32 in total

1.  Hawkins and Stevens revisited with insert earphones.

Authors:  Adrianus J M Houtsma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels.

Authors:  Martin Schürmann; Gina Caetano; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Integration of touch and sound in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Mark Augath; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Evidence of vibrotactile input to human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gina Caetano; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness.

Authors:  Helge Gillmeister; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Multisensory convergence in auditory cortex, II. Thalamocortical connections of the caudal superior temporal plane.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett; Lisa A De La Mothe; Istvan Ulbert; George Karmos; John Smiley; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus responses to somatosensory stimulation are enhanced after noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  S E Shore; S Koehler; M Oldakowski; L F Hughes; S Syed
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Vibrotactile--auditory interactions are post-perceptual.

Authors:  Kielan Yarrow; Patrick Haggard; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.

Authors:  L D Braida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

10.  Projections from the trigeminal nuclear complex to the cochlear nuclei: a retrograde and anterograde tracing study in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Jianxun Zhou; Susan Shore
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.