Literature DB >> 19011391

Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.

Wenjie Yang1, Dongfeng Gu, Jing Chen, Cashell E Jaquish, D C Rao, Xigui Wu, James E Hixson, Xiufang Duan, Tanika N Kelly, L Lee Hamm, Paul K Whelton, Jiang He.   

Abstract

The random-zero sphygmomanometer has been widely used in observational studies and clinical trials for blood pressure measurement. We examined the agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers among 2007 Chinese study participants aged 15 to 60 years. Three blood pressure readings were obtained by trained observers using random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers, respectively, in a random order. Overall, blood pressure readings obtained using the random-zero device were significantly lower than those obtained with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer, with a mean difference ranging from -3.0 to -2.7 mm Hg for systolic and -1.4 to -0.9 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (all P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between mean blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers were high (0.90 for systolic and 0.85 for diastolic blood pressure, both P < 0.0001). In conclusion, our study indicated that there was strong agreement between blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers although blood pressure values were on average lower with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19011391      PMCID: PMC2587170          DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31816956ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  31 in total

1.  Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  E O'Brien; B Waeber; G Parati; J Staessen; M G Myers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

2.  Measuring blood pressure accurately: new and persistent challenges.

Authors:  Daniel W Jones; Lawrence J Appel; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease.

Authors:  Majid Ezzati; Alan D Lopez; Anthony Rodgers; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  Jason J S Waugh; Manesh Gupta; Julie Rushbrook; Aidan Halligan; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  A random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  B M Wright; C F Dore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  D Parker; K Liu; A R Dyer; D Giumetti; Y L Liao; J Stamler
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  N M van Popele; W J Bos; N A de Beer; D A van Der Kuip; A Hofman; D E Grobbee; J C Witteman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.

Authors:  R de Gaudemaris; A R Folsom; R J Prineas; R V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  GenSalt: rationale, design, methods and baseline characteristics of study participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.012

View more
  4 in total

1.  Calibration of observational measurement of rate of responding.

Authors:  Oliver C Mudford; Jason R Zeleny; Wayne W Fisher; Molly E Klum; Todd M Owen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Prospective relevance of fruit and vegetable consumption and salt intake during adolescence for blood pressure in young adulthood.

Authors:  Danika Krupp; Lijie Shi; Sarah Egert; Stefan A Wudy; Thomas Remer
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Prospective relation of adolescent citrate excretion and net acid excretion capacity with blood pressure in young adulthood.

Authors:  Danika Krupp; Timm H Westhoff; Jonas Esche; Thomas Remer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2018-07-18

4.  The Prevalence of Uncontrolled Hypertension among Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications and the Associated Risk Factors in North Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Issa S Alawneh; Ahmad Yasin; Samar Musmar
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2022-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.