Literature DB >> 21941386

Calibration of observational measurement of rate of responding.

Oliver C Mudford1, Jason R Zeleny, Wayne W Fisher, Molly E Klum, Todd M Owen.   

Abstract

The quality of measurement systems used in almost all natural sciences other than behavior analysis is usually evaluated through calibration study rather than relying on interobserver agreement. We demonstrated some of the basic features of calibration using observer-measured rates of free-operant responding from 10 scripted 10-min calibration samples on video. Five novice and 5 experienced observers recorded (on laptop computers) response samples with a priori determined response rates ranging from 0 to 8 responses per minute. Observer records were then compared with these predetermined reference values using linear regression and related graphical depiction. Results indicated that all of the observers recorded rates that were accurate to within ±0.4 responses per minute and 5 were accurate to within ±0.1 responses per minute, indicating that continuous recording of responding on computers can be highly accurate and precise. Additional research is recommended to investigate conditions that affect the quality of direct observational measurement of behavior.

Keywords:  calibration; continuous recording; observer accuracy; observer precision; recording and measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21941386      PMCID: PMC3177337          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  10 in total

1.  Applying signal-detection theory to the study of observer accuracy and bias in behavioral assessment.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Allison Tetreault; Alyson Hovanetz; Emily Bellaci; Jonathan Miller; Hilary Karp; Angela Mahmood; Maggie Strobel; Shelley Mullen; Alice Keyl; Alexis Toupard
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  Reliability of a portable head-mounted eye tracking instrument for schizophrenia research.

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Matithew T Avila; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert P McMahon; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

3.  Taking a closer look: time sampling and measurement error.

Authors:  J Powell; B Martindale; S Kulp; A Martindale; R Bauman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

4.  The effects of instructions and calculation procedures on observers' accuracy, agreement, and calculation correctness.

Authors:  R A Boykin; R O Nelson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

5.  Reviewer's comment: just because it's reliable doesn't mean that you can use it.

Authors:  D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

6.  Progressing toward data intimacy: a review of within-session data analysis.

Authors:  Tara A Fahmie; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Continuous recording and interobserver agreement algorithms reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1995-2005).

Authors:  Oliver C Mudford; Sarah Ann Taylor; Neil T Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

8.  Assessing observer accuracy in continuous recording of rate and duration: three algorithms compared.

Authors:  Oliver C Mudford; Neil T Martin; Jasmine K Y Hui; Sarah Ann Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

9.  An empirical method for determining an appropriate interval length for recording behavior.

Authors:  R W Sanson-Fisher; A D Poole; J Dunn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1980

10.  Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  Wenjie Yang; Dongfeng Gu; Jing Chen; Cashell E Jaquish; D C Rao; Xigui Wu; James E Hixson; Xiufang Duan; Tanika N Kelly; L Lee Hamm; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.378

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.