Literature DB >> 19008508

Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research.

Anne Landman1, Stanton A Glantz.   

Abstract

The tobacco industry, working through third parties to prevent policy-relevant research that adversely affected it between 1988 and 1998, used coordinated, well-funded strategies in repeated attempts to silence tobacco researcher Stanton A. Glantz. Tactics included advertising, litigation, and attempts to have the US Congress cut off the researcher's National Cancer Institute funding. Efforts like these can influence the policymaking process by silencing opposing voices and discouraging other scientists from doing work that may expose them to tobacco industry attacks. The support of highly credible public health organizations and of researchers' employers is crucial to the continued advancement of public health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19008508      PMCID: PMC2600597          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  39 in total

Review 1.  "Care and feeding": the Asian environmental tobacco smoke consultants programme.

Authors:  M Assunta; N Fields; J Knight; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components.

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  The creation of industry front groups: the tobacco industry and "get government off our back".

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health.

Authors:  Y Saloojee; E Dagli
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 5.  The Surgeon General's 1989 Report on Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  1989-03-24

6.  Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease.

Authors:  C M Fichtenberg; S A Glantz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.

Authors:  Katherine Bryan-Jones; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s.

Authors:  M S Givel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Daniel K Cortese; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Tobacco industry campaign contributions are affecting tobacco control policymaking in California.

Authors:  S A Glantz; M E Begay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  13 in total

1.  The nature, scope, and development of the global tobacco control epistemic community.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Research integrity: Don't let transparency damage science.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Dorothy Bishop
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action.

Authors:  William H Wiist
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Personalized medicine and tobacco-related health disparities: is there a role for genetics?

Authors:  Chris Carlsten; Abigail Halperin; Julia Crouch; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Financial Conflicts of Interest and Stance on Tobacco Harm Reduction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yogi H Hendlin; Manali Vora; Jesse Elias; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The pattern of indoor smoking restriction law transitions, 1970-2009: laws are sticky.

Authors:  Ashley Sanders-Jackson; Mariaelena Gonzalez; Brandon Zerbe; Anna V Song; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Success counteracting tobacco company interference in Thailand: an example of FCTC implementation for low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Naowarut Charoenca; Jeremiah Mock; Nipapun Kungskulniti; Sunida Preechawong; Nicholas Kojetin; Stephen L Hamann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Information to Improve Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA's) Tobacco Regulatory Role.

Authors:  Amira Osman; Sarah D Kowitt; Paschal Sheeran; Kristen L Jarman; Leah M Ranney; Adam O Goldstein
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Successful countering of tobacco industry efforts to overturn Thailand's ENDS ban.

Authors:  Roengrudee Patanavanich; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.