Literature DB >> 25452544

Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records.

Sarah Walker1, Chris Hyde1, William Hamilton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the UK. GPs are encouraged to refer all women whose symptoms may represent cancer, rather than selecting those at highest risk. AIM: To identify and quantify features of breast cancer in primary care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A UK case-control study using the Clinical Practice Research Database (CPRD).
METHOD: Possible features of breast cancer were identified in the year before diagnosis, and odds ratios calculated using conditional logistic regression. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated for consulting women.
RESULTS: A total of 3994 women aged ≥40 years with breast cancer between 2000 and 2009, and 16 873 age-, sex-, and practice-matched controls were studied. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (interquartile range 55-74 years). Four features were significantly associated with breast cancer: breast lump (odds ratio [OR] 110; 95% confidence interval [CI] = I88 to 150), breast pain (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 3.0 to 6.0), nipple retraction (OR = 26; 95% CI = 10 to 64), nipple discharge (OR = 19; 95% CI = 8.6 to 41): all P-values <0.01. In the year before diagnosis, 1762 (44%) of cases had a breast lump compared with 132 (0.8%) controls. The PPV of breast cancer with a breast lump was 4.8% in women aged 40-49 years, rising to 48% in women aged >70 years. PPVs were lower in women who also reported breast pain.
CONCLUSION: Generally, the figures support current referral practice. However, the low likelihood of cancer for all the non-lump symptoms means that the current guidance recommends investigation for possible cancer at a more liberal risk threshold than for other cancers. Although supported by patients, this may not meet current NHS criteria for cost-benefit. © British Journal of General Practice 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; diagnosis; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25452544      PMCID: PMC4240152          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14X682873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting delayed presentation of symptomatic breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A J Ramirez; A M Westcombe; C C Burgess; S Sutton; P Littlejohns; M A Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Understanding why women delay in seeking help for breast cancer symptoms.

Authors:  Alison Bish; Amanda Ramirez; Caroline Burgess; Myra Hunter
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome.

Authors:  M B Barton; J G Elmore; S W Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The presentation and management of female breast symptoms in general practice in Sheffield.

Authors:  P Newton; D R Hannay; R Laver
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Characterizing breast symptoms in family practice.

Authors:  Margaret M Eberl; Robert L Phillips; Henk Lamberts; Inge Okkes; Martin C Mahoney
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets.

Authors:  L Elliss-Brookes; S McPhail; A Ives; M Greenslade; J Shelton; S Hiom; M Richards
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Clinical features of bladder cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; Sally Stapley; Richard D Neal; Peter Rose; Fiona M Walter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The risk of oesophago-gastric cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  S Stapley; T J Peters; R D Neal; P W Rose; F M Walter; W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Validation of the diagnosis of autism in general practitioner records.

Authors:  Eric Fombonne; Lisa Heavey; Liam Smeeth; Laura C Rodrigues; Claire Cook; Peter G Smith; Linyan Meng; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  W Hamilton; A Round; D Sharp; T J Peters
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

1.  Selection of men for investigation of possible testicular cancer in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic patient records.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Shephard; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Is omission of free text records a possible source of data loss and bias in Clinical Practice Research Datalink studies? A case-control study.

Authors:  Sarah J Price; Sal A Stapley; Elizabeth Shephard; Kevin Barraclough; William T Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Symptom Signatures and Diagnostic Timeliness in Cancer Patients: A Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Minjoung M Koo; William Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Greg P Rubin; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Typical and atypical presenting symptoms of breast cancer and their associations with diagnostic intervals: Evidence from a national audit of cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Minjoung Monica Koo; Christian von Wagner; Gary A Abel; Sean McPhail; Greg P Rubin; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Clinical relevance of thrombocytosis in primary care: a prospective cohort study of cancer incidence using English electronic medical records and cancer registry data.

Authors:  Sarah Er Bailey; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Elizabeth A Shephard; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Do pre-diagnosis primary care consultation patterns explain deprivation-specific differences in net survival among women with breast cancer? An examination of individually-linked data from the UK West Midlands cancer registry, national screening programme and Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  M Morris; L M Woods; K Bhaskaran; B Rachet
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Patient-doctor continuity and diagnosis of cancer: electronic medical records study in general practice.

Authors:  Matthew J Ridd; Diana L Santos Ferreira; Alan A Montgomery; Chris Salisbury; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Cytological evaluation of breast lesions in symptomatic patients presenting to Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ken Munene Nkonge; Emily Adhiambo Rogena; Edwin Owino Walong; Dennis Karani Nkonge
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Increased consultation frequency in primary care, a risk marker for cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Marcela Ewing; Peter Naredi; Szilard Nemes; Chenyang Zhang; Jörgen Månsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 10.  Is real world evidence influencing practice? A systematic review of CPRD research in NICE guidances.

Authors:  Jessie O Oyinlola; Jennifer Campbell; Antonis A Kousoulis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.