Literature DB >> 18996372

Asymmetry of focal macular photopic negative responses (PhNRs) in monkeys.

Yukihide Kurimoto1, Mineo Kondo, Shinji Ueno, Takao Sakai, Shigeki Machida, Hiroko Terasaki.   

Abstract

The photopic negative response (PhNR) is a slow, negative-going wave of the photopic electroretinogram (ERG) that appears after the b-wave. Recent studies have shown that the PhNR originates from the spiking activities of inner retinal neurons including the ganglion cells and their axons. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is any asymmetry in the amplitude of the PhNR elicited from the upper and lower macular areas, and between the nasal and temporal macular areas in rhesus monkeys. To accomplish this, we recorded focal macular PhNRs that were elicited by red hemi-circular stimuli presented on a blue background. We show that the PhNR from the upper macular area was significantly larger than that of the lower macular area, and the PhNR of the nasal macula was significantly larger than that of the temporal macula. These asymmetries were present in the focal PhNR elicited by both brief and long duration stimuli, and the asymmetries were completely eliminated by an intravitreal injection of tetrodotoxin (TTX). These results suggest that the upper-lower and nasal-temporal asymmetries of PhNR in the primate retina are mainly caused by TTX-sensitive spiking activities of inner retinal neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18996372     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  8 in total

1.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Han Cheng; Ying-Sheng Hu; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Relation between macular retinal ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness and multifocal electroretinogram measures in experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Nimesh B Patel; Lakshmi P Rajagopalan; Ronald S Harwerth; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Photopic negative response of full-field and focal macular electroretinograms in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Kunifusa Tamada; Shigeki Machida; Daisuke Yokoyama; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Focal macular photopic negative response in patients with optic neuritis.

Authors:  H Nakamura; K Miyamoto; S Yokota; K Ogino; N Yoshimura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Significant correlations between focal photopic negative response and focal visual sensitivity and ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Masahiko Ishizuka; Shigeki Machida; Yuji Hara; Atsushi Tada; Satoshi Ebihara; Mana Gonmori; Tomoharu Nishimura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Comparison of photopic negative response of full-field and focal electroretinograms in detecting glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Kunifusa Tamada; Taku Oikawa; Yasutaka Gotoh; Tomoharu Nishimura; Muneyoshi Kaneko; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Reduced Retinal Function in the Absence of Na(v)1.6.

Authors:  Benjamin J Smith; Patrice D Côté
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.