Literature DB >> 34843022

Significant correlations between focal photopic negative response and focal visual sensitivity and ganglion cell complex thickness in glaucomatous eyes.

Masahiko Ishizuka1, Shigeki Machida2, Yuji Hara1, Atsushi Tada1, Satoshi Ebihara1, Mana Gonmori1, Tomoharu Nishimura1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether there are significant correlations between the focal photopic negative response (PhNR), the focal visual sensitivity and the ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in glaucomatous eyes. STUDY
DESIGN: Single-center observational study.
METHODS: Fifty-two eyes of 52 patients (71.4 ± 9.42 years) with clinically diagnosed open angle glaucoma were studied. Thirty-six age-matched normal subjects served as controls. The focal PhNR of the focal macular electroretinograms (fmERGs) were elicited by a 15° circular, a superior semicircular or an inferior semicircular stimulus centered on the fovea. The thickness of the GCC was measured in the corresponding retinal areas in the spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images. The visual sensitivities (dB) were measured by microperimetry at the retinal area where the fmERGs were elicited and were converted to liner values (1/Lambert).
RESULTS: The focal PhNR amplitudes were significantly correlated with the visual sensitivities of the full-circle (R = 0.532), the superior (R = 0.530) and inferior (R = 0.526) semicircular responses (P < 0.0001). The GCC thickness was correlated with the visual sensitivities in the same areas with stronger correlations (R = 0.700, 0.759 and 0.650, respectively; P < 0.0001). The focal PhNR amplitudes were proportionally reduced with the thinning of the GCC thickness (R = 0.494, 0.518 and 0.511, respectively; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The significant correlations between the focal PhNR amplitudes, the focal visual sensitivities and the GCC thickness indicate that these may be good biomarkers to track the changes in the physiology and anatomy of the macular area in glaucomatous eyes.
© 2021. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroretinogram; Focal macular ERG; Glaucoma; PhNR; Photopic negative response

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34843022     DOI: 10.1007/s10384-021-00886-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  42 in total

1.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hongling Chen; Dezheng Wu; Shizhou Huang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Selective amplitude reduction of the PhNR after macular hole surgery: ganglion cell damage related to ICG-assisted ILM peeling and gas tamponade.

Authors:  Shinji Ueno; Mineo Kondo; Chang-Hua Piao; Kazuteru Ikenoya; Yozo Miyake; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations.

Authors:  Kentaro Miyata; Makoto Nakamura; Mineo Kondo; Jian Lin; Shinji Ueno; Yozo Miyake; Hiroko Terasaki
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The time course of visual field recovery and changes of retinal ganglion cells after optic chiasmal decompression.

Authors:  Chan Hee Moon; Sun Chul Hwang; Young-Hoon Ohn; Tae Kwann Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Junya Kizawa; Shigeki Machida; Takaki Kobayashi; Yasutaka Gotoh; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Gotoh; Shigeki Machida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

9.  Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Laura J Frishman; E Ulysses Dorotheo; Jade S Schiffman; Hasan M Bahrani; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Yasutaka Gotoh; Michiko Tanaka; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.