Literature DB >> 18987294

Correlation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio to laboratory International Normalized Ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin.

Robert W Hoel1, Robert C Albright, Lisa K Beyer, Paula J Santrach, Donna L Magtibay, Stephanie L Everson, Robert D McBane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine whether point-of-care (POC) International Normalized Ratio (INR) test results correlate with plasma INR measures in intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) patients on warfarin. Anemia is thought to reduce the accuracy of POC INR assay results. Whether POC INR testing could be implemented for hemodialysis patients on chronic warfarin, who are often anemic despite hematopoietic therapy, has not been established. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-seven chronic hemodialysis patients on warfarin contributed sets of three consecutive blood samples for INR comparison immediately before hemodialysis: one finger stick, two from hemodialysis access (arteriovenous graft, fistula, or catheter). POC INR testing was performed using CoaguChek S device. Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 32%.
RESULTS: Pairwise comparison and correlation of 258 INR results showed high correlation for POC versus laboratory INR (r = 0.94; P < 0.001). Of these, 16 (6%) differed by >0.6 INR units, four (1.6%) differed by >0.8 INR units, and one differed by >1.0 INR units. Resulting pairwise correlation analyses between samples were: for anemic patients (0.96; P < 0.001), nonanemic patients (0.93; P < 0.001), and for those obtained from arteriovenous grafts (0.94; P < 0.001). POC INR samples from dialysis catheters correlated poorly with laboratory INR results.
CONCLUSIONS: POC INR correlates well with plasma INR measures in IHD patients requiring chronic warfarin, and anemia did not influence this reliability. Blood sampling from finger stick or arteriovenous graft or fistula showed excellent correlation with laboratory INR, whereas sampling from dialysis catheters was unsatisfactory, likely from heparin contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18987294      PMCID: PMC2615705          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.03360708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  7 in total

1.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Differences in warfarin dosing decisions based on international normalized ratio measurements with two point-of-care testing devices and a reference laboratory measurement.

Authors:  Kenneth M Shermock; Lee Bragg; Jason T Connor; Jodie Fink; Georgann Mazzoli; Kandice Kottke-Marchant
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Clinical impact of point-of-care vs laboratory measurement of anticoagulation.

Authors:  Rubina Sunderji; Kenneth Gin; Karen Shalansky; Cedric Carter; Keith Chambers; Cheryl Davies; Linda Schwartz; Anthony Fung
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Point of care testing for INR monitoring: where are we now?

Authors:  E T Murray; D A Fitzmaurice; D McCahon
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs.

Authors:  Robert D McBane; Cindy L Felty; Mindy L Hartgers; Rajeev Chaudhry; Lisa K Beyer; Paula J Santrach
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Safety of anticoagulation therapy in well-informed older patients.

Authors:  Nadya Kagansky; Hilla Knobler; Ephraim Rimon; Zinaida Ozer; Shmuel Levy
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-11

7.  Patient satisfaction with point-of-care international normalized ratio testing and counseling in a community internal medicine practice.

Authors:  Rajeev Chaudhry; Sidna M Scheitel; Robert J Stroebel; Paula J Santrach; Denise M Dupras; Eric G Tangalos
Journal:  Manag Care Interface       Date:  2004-03
  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Portable coagulometer devices in the monitoring and control of oral anticoagulation therapy: a systematic review].

Authors:  Javier Caballero-Villarraso; Román Villegas-Portero; Fernando Rodríguez-Cantalejo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Vitamin K antagonist has a higher impact than heparin in preventing circuit clotting in chronic haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Charles; Yannick Le Meur; Tugdual Tanquerel; Hubert Galinat
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-10-10

3.  A New Method for the Measurement of International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients with Heparin-Locked Tunneled Dialysis Catheters.

Authors:  Céline B Seghers; Kristien Ver Elst; Jolien Claessens; Steven Weekx; Sigrid Vermeiren; Manu Henckes
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2020-12-22

4.  Evaluation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Syeda Rahman; Andrew Srisuwananukorn; Robert E Molokie; Michel Gowhari; Franklin Njoku; Faiz Ahmed Hussain; James Lee; Edith A Nutescu; Victor R Gordeuk; Santosh L Saraf; Jin Han
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-05-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.