Literature DB >> 23239307

Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations.

Michael Kranzfelder1, Christoph Staub, Adam Fiolka, Armin Schneider, Sonja Gillen, Dirk Wilhelm, Helmut Friess, Alois Knoll, Hubertus Feussner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current trend in surgery toward further trauma reduction inevitably leads to increased technological complexity. It must be assumed that this situation will not stay under the sole control of surgeons; mechanical systems will assist them. Certain segments of the work flow will likely have to be taken over by a machine in an automatized or autonomous mode.
METHODS: In addition to the analysis of our own surgical practice, a literature search of the Medline database was performed to identify important aspects, methods, and technologies for increased operating room (OR) autonomy.
RESULTS: Robotic surgical systems can help to increase OR autonomy by camera control, application of intelligent instruments, and even accomplishment of automated surgical procedures. However, the important step from simple task execution to autonomous decision making is difficult to realize. Another important aspect is the adaption of the general technical OR environment. This includes adaptive OR setting and context-adaptive interfaces, automated tool arrangement, and optimal visualization. Finally, integration of peri- and intraoperative data consisting of electronic patient record, OR documentation and logistics, medical imaging, and patient surveillance data could increase autonomy.
CONCLUSIONS: To gain autonomy in the OR, a variety of assistance systems and methodologies need to be incorporated that endorse the surgeon autonomously as a first step toward the vision of cognitive surgery. Thus, we require establishment of model-based surgery and integration of procedural tasks. Structured knowledge is therefore indispensable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239307     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2656-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  A wearable, wireless gaze tracker with integrated selection command source for human-computer interaction.

Authors:  Ville Rantanen; Toni Vanhala; Outi Tuisku; Pekka-Henrik Niemenlehto; Jarmo Verho; Veikko Surakka; Martti Juhola; Jukka Lekkala
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 2.  Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  You can't touch this: touch-free navigation through radiological images.

Authors:  Lars C Ebert; Gary Hatch; Garyfalia Ampanozi; Michael J Thali; Steffen Ross
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  How does the camera assistant decide the zooming ratio of laparoscopic images? Analysis and implementation.

Authors:  Atsushi Nishikawa; Hiroaki Nakagoe; Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Yasuo Yamada; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Shuji Takiguchi; Morito Monden; Fumio Miyazaki
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

5.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Pre-operative ordering of minimally invasive surgical tools: a fuzzy inference system approach.

Authors:  David J Miller; Carl A Nelson; Dmitry Oleynikov; David D Jones
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Structured electronic operative reporting: comparison with dictation in kidney cancer surgery.

Authors:  Darryl N Hoffer; Antonio Finelli; Raymond Chow; Justin Liu; Tran Truong; Kelly Lane; Sanoj Punnen; Jennifer J Knox; Laura Legere; Ghada Kurban; Brenda Gallie; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 8.  Using real-time clinical decision support to improve performance on perioperative quality and process measures.

Authors:  Anthony Chau; Jesse M Ehrenfeld
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2011-03

9.  Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Avinash N Supe; Gaurav V Kulkarni; Pradnya A Supe
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Development of a stereo vision measurement system for a 3D three-axial pneumatic parallel mechanism robot arm.

Authors:  Mao-Hsiung Chiang; Hao-Ting Lin; Chien-Lun Hou
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Toward cognitive pipelines of medical assistance algorithms.

Authors:  Patrick Philipp; Maria Maleshkova; Darko Katic; Christian Weber; Michael Götz; Achim Rettinger; Stefanie Speidel; Benedikt Kämpgen; Marco Nolden; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Müller; Rudi Studer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  LapOntoSPM: an ontology for laparoscopic surgeries and its application to surgical phase recognition.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Chantal Julliard; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel; Pierre Jannin; Bernard Gibaud
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Reliability of sensor-based real-time workflow recognition in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Armin Schneider; Adam Fiolka; Sebastian Koller; Silvano Reiser; Thomas Vogel; Dirk Wilhelm; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  [Further technical and digital development in minimally invasive and conventional surgery].

Authors:  H Feussner; S B Reiser; M Bauer; M Kranzfelder; R Schirren; J Kleeff; D Wilhelm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Bridging the gap between formal and experience-based knowledge for context-aware laparoscopy.

Authors:  Darko Katić; Jürgen Schuck; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Hannes Kenngott; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Rüdiger Dillmann; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies.

Authors:  H G Kenngott; M Wagner; F Nickel; A L Wekerle; A Preukschas; M Apitz; T Schulte; R Rempel; P Mietkowski; F Wagner; A Termer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  The intelligent OR: design and validation of a context-aware surgical working environment.

Authors:  Stefan Franke; Max Rockstroh; Mathias Hofer; Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  A learning robot for cognitive camera control in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Martin Wagner; Andreas Bihlmaier; F Mathis-Ullrich; B P Müller-Stich; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Patrick Mietkowski; Paul Maria Scheikl; Sebastian Bodenstedt; Anja Schiepe-Tiska; Josephin Vetter; Felix Nickel; S Speidel; H Wörn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The next step: intelligent digital assistance for clinical operating rooms.

Authors:  Juliana Miehle; Daniel Ostler; Nadine Gerstenlauer; Wolfgang Minker
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-08-25

Review 10.  Surgical process modeling.

Authors:  Thomas Neumuth
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.