Literature DB >> 18981414

Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure.

Birte U Forstmann1, Gilles Dutilh, Scott Brown, Jane Neumann, D Yves von Cramon, K Richard Ridderinkhof, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers.   

Abstract

Human decision-making almost always takes place under time pressure. When people are engaged in activities such as shopping, driving, or playing chess, they have to continually balance the demands for fast decisions against the demands for accurate decisions. In the cognitive sciences, this balance is thought to be modulated by a response threshold, the neural substrate of which is currently subject to speculation. In a speed decision-making experiment, we presented participants with cues that indicated different requirements for response speed. Application of a mathematical model for the behavioral data confirmed that cueing for speed lowered the response threshold. Functional neuroimaging showed that cueing for speed activates the striatum and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), brain structures that are part of a closed-loop motor circuit involved in the preparation of voluntary action plans. Moreover, activation in the striatum is known to release the motor system from global inhibition, thereby facilitating faster but possibly premature actions. Finally, the data show that individual variation in the activation of striatum and pre-SMA is selectively associated with individual variation in the amplitude of the adjustments in the response threshold estimated by the mathematical model. These results demonstrate that when people have to make decisions under time pressure their striatum and pre-SMA show increased levels of activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981414      PMCID: PMC2582260          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0805903105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic input zones from the presupplementary motor area in the macaque monkey: comparison with the input zones from the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  M Inase; H Tokuno; A Nambu; T Akazawa; M Takada
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-07-03       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

Authors:  K H Britten; M N Shadlen; W T Newsome; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades.

Authors:  Joshua W Brown; Daniel Bullock; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2004-05

6.  Cortico-basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks.

Authors:  Chung-Chuan Lo; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Kevin Gurney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Eric Brown; Jeff Moehlis; Philip Holmes; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

Authors:  Scott D Brown; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The neural and computational basis of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff during task performance.

Authors:  Vincent van Veen; Marie K Krug; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  221 in total

1.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Daniel R Little; Thomas W James
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Jobi S George; Frederick Verbruggen; Christopher D Chambers; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Expectations and violations: delineating the neural network of proactive inhibitory control.

Authors:  Bram B Zandbelt; Mirjam Bloemendaal; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; René S Kahn; Matthijs Vink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control.

Authors:  Leonhard Schilbach; Simon B Eickhoff; Edna Cieslik; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 6.  Prefrontal cortex and impulsive decision making.

Authors:  Soyoun Kim; Daeyeol Lee
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.

Authors:  Royce Anders; Stéphanie Riès; Leendert Van Maanen; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  How cognitive theory guides neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

9.  How attention influences perceptual decision making: Single-trial EEG correlates of drift-diffusion model parameters.

Authors:  Michael D Nunez; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Frontoparietal networks involved in categorization and item working memory.

Authors:  Kurt Braunlich; Javier Gomez-Lavin; Carol A Seger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.