Literature DB >> 18980847

A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect.

Christian Unkelbach1, Christoph Stahl.   

Abstract

The subjective impression that statements are true increases when statements are presented repeatedly. There are two sources for this truth effect: An increase in validity based on recollection (a controlled process) and increase in processing fluency due to repeated exposure (an automatic process). Using multinomial processing trees (MPT), we present a comprehensive model of the truth effect. Furthermore, we show that whilst the increase in processing fluency is indeed automatic, the interpretation and use of that experience is not. Experiment 1 demonstrates the standard use of the fluency experience and Experiment 2 demonstrates that people can change the interpretation of the experience according to its ecological validity. By implication, the truth effect represents the adaptive usage of feedback received from internal processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980847     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  11 in total

1.  The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth.

Authors:  Rita R Silva; Teresa Garcia-Marques; Joana Mello
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-30

2.  The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth.

Authors:  Rolf Reber; Christian Unkelbach
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2010-09-07

3.  Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Sharda Umanath; Roberto Cabeza; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 4.  Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes.

Authors:  Daniel W Heck; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect.

Authors:  Aumyo Hassan; Sarah J Barber
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Monetary incentives do not reduce the repetition-induced truth effect.

Authors:  Felix Speckmann; Christian Unkelbach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  A validation of the two-high threshold eyewitness identification model by reanalyzing published data.

Authors:  Nicola Marie Menne; Kristina Winter; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.

Authors:  Kristina Winter; Nicola M Menne; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  The truth revisited: Bayesian analysis of individual differences in the truth effect.

Authors:  Martin Schnuerch; Lena Nadarevic; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-10-26

10.  Is it all about the feeling? Affective and (meta-)cognitive mechanisms underlying the truth effect.

Authors:  Annika Stump; Jan Rummel; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.